From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chao Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid garbage collecting already moved node blocks Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:05:23 +0800 Message-ID: <01b701d0db27$8c68f2c0$a53ad840$@samsung.com> References: <1439593751-21879-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <1439593751-21879-2-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSLoe-0007lM-Dj for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:07:20 +0000 Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1ZSLoc-0007Eh-EN for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:07:20 +0000 Received: from epcpsbgm2new.samsung.com (epcpsbgm2 [203.254.230.27]) by mailout4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NTD018S8INHHQ70@mailout4.samsung.com> for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:06:53 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <1439593751-21879-2-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Content-language: zh-cn List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org] > Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 7:09 AM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid garbage collecting already moved node blocks > > If node blocks were already moved, we don't need to move them again. > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Chao Yu ------------------------------------------------------------------------------