linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@huawei.com>,
	jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com
Cc: miaoxie@huawei.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] f2fs: support superblock checksum
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 20:24:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d7dbbd2-d94a-ccf8-7ef9-80086cf0af7d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df6895b0-d94c-e5a5-82e2-2f8e5439d0b3@huawei.com>

On 2018/8/8 20:21, Junling Zheng wrote:
> On 2018/8/8 20:03, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/8/8 18:27, Junling Zheng wrote:
>>> Now we support crc32 checksum for superblock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Junling Zheng <zhengjunling@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>  - add sysfs entry for superblock checksum.
>>>  - move the crc checking to the beginning of sanity_check_raw_super().
>>>  - fix the NULL pointer dereference as sb->s_fs_info hasn't be set yet in
>>>    sanity_check_raw_super().
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>  - fix to switch endian of crc.
>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h          |  2 ++
>>>  fs/f2fs/super.c         | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c         |  7 +++++++
>>>  include/linux/f2fs_fs.h |  3 ++-
>>>  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index 4525f4f82af0..d50d6efda96b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {
>>>  #define F2FS_FEATURE_INODE_CRTIME	0x0100
>>>  #define F2FS_FEATURE_LOST_FOUND		0x0200
>>>  #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY		0x0400	/* reserved */
>>> +#define F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM		0x0800
>>>  
>>>  #define F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sb, mask)					\
>>>  	((F2FS_SB(sb)->raw_super->feature & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0)
>>> @@ -3376,6 +3377,7 @@ F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(flexible_inline_xattr, FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR);
>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(quota_ino, QUOTA_INO);
>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(inode_crtime, INODE_CRTIME);
>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(lost_found, LOST_FOUND);
>>> +F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, SB_CHKSUM);
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>>>  static inline int get_blkz_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> index bd57be470e23..c3dbafa31613 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> @@ -2149,6 +2149,26 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>  					(bh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET);
>>>  	struct super_block *sb = sbi->sb;
>>>  	unsigned int blocksize;
>>> +	size_t crc_offset = 0;
>>> +	__u32 crc = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Check checksum_offset and crc in superblock */
>>> +	if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->feature) & F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM) {
>>> +		crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->checksum_offset);
>>> +		if (crc_offset !=
>>> +			offsetof(struct f2fs_super_block, crc)) {
>>> +			f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
>>> +				"Invalid SB checksum offset: %lu",
>>
>> warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument
>> 4 has type ‘size_t’ [-Wformat=]
>>      crc_offset);
>>
> 
> :( sorry, I'll send a v4 patch.
> 
>> Otherwise, it looks good to me, you can add in next version:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> +				crc_offset);
>>> +			return 1;
>>> +		}
>>> +		crc = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->crc);
>>> +		if (!f2fs_crc_valid(sbi, crc, raw_super, crc_offset)) {
>>> +			f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
>>> +				"Invalid SB checksum value: %u", crc);
>>> +			return 1;
>>> +		}
>>> +	}
>>>  
>>>  	if (F2FS_SUPER_MAGIC != le32_to_cpu(raw_super->magic)) {
>>>  		f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
>>> @@ -2568,6 +2588,7 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>  int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct buffer_head *bh;
>>> +	__u32 crc = 0;
>>>  	int err;
>>>  
>>>  	if ((recover && f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb)) ||
>>> @@ -2576,6 +2597,14 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
>>>  		return -EROFS;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	/* we should update superblock crc here */
>>> +	if (!recover &&
>>> +		F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->sb, F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)) {

Can we change to use f2fs_sb_has_sb_chksum()?

Thanks,

>>> +		crc = f2fs_crc32(sbi, F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi),
>>> +				offsetof(struct f2fs_super_block, crc));
>>> +		F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi)->crc = cpu_to_le32(crc);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>  	/* write back-up superblock first */
>>>  	bh = sb_bread(sbi->sb, sbi->valid_super_block ? 0 : 1);
>>>  	if (!bh)
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
>>> index cd2e030e47b8..c86d91be6c48 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
>>> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ static ssize_t features_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>>>  	if (f2fs_sb_has_lost_found(sb))
>>>  		len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
>>>  				len ? ", " : "", "lost_found");
>>> +	if (f2fs_sb_has_sb_chksum(sb))
>>> +		len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%s%s",
>>> +				len ? ", " : "", "sb_checksum");
>>>  	len += snprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "\n");
>>>  	return len;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ enum feat_id {
>>>  	FEAT_QUOTA_INO,
>>>  	FEAT_INODE_CRTIME,
>>>  	FEAT_LOST_FOUND,
>>> +	FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>>> @@ -353,6 +357,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>>>  	case FEAT_QUOTA_INO:
>>>  	case FEAT_INODE_CRTIME:
>>>  	case FEAT_LOST_FOUND:
>>> +	case FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM:
>>>  		return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "supported\n");
>>>  	}
>>>  	return 0;
>>> @@ -433,6 +438,7 @@ F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(flexible_inline_xattr, FEAT_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR);
>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(quota_ino, FEAT_QUOTA_INO);
>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(inode_crtime, FEAT_INODE_CRTIME);
>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(lost_found, FEAT_LOST_FOUND);
>>> +F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR(sb_checksum, FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM);
>>>  
>>>  #define ATTR_LIST(name) (&f2fs_attr_##name.attr)
>>>  static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = {
>>> @@ -489,6 +495,7 @@ static struct attribute *f2fs_feat_attrs[] = {
>>>  	ATTR_LIST(quota_ino),
>>>  	ATTR_LIST(inode_crtime),
>>>  	ATTR_LIST(lost_found),
>>> +	ATTR_LIST(sb_checksum),
>>>  	NULL,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
>>> index f70f8ac9c4f4..aa4b586569c1 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
>>> @@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ struct f2fs_super_block {
>>>  	struct f2fs_device devs[MAX_DEVICES];	/* device list */
>>>  	__le32 qf_ino[F2FS_MAX_QUOTAS];	/* quota inode numbers */
>>>  	__u8 hot_ext_count;		/* # of hot file extension */
>>> -	__u8 reserved[314];		/* valid reserved region */
>>> +	__u8 reserved[310];		/* valid reserved region */
>>> +	__le32 crc;			/* checksum of superblock */
>>>  } __packed;
>>>  
>>>  /*
>>>
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-08 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-08 10:27 [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] f2fs: support superblock checksum Junling Zheng
2018-08-08 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] f2fs-tools: rename CHECKSUM_OFFSET to CP_CHKSUM_OFFSET Junling Zheng
2018-08-08 13:08   ` Chao Yu
2018-08-08 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] f2fs-tools: introduce sb checksum Junling Zheng
2018-08-08 13:25   ` Chao Yu
2018-08-08 12:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] f2fs: support superblock checksum Chao Yu
2018-08-08 12:21   ` Junling Zheng
2018-08-08 12:24     ` Chao Yu [this message]
2018-08-08 12:38       ` Junling Zheng
2018-08-08 12:54     ` [RFC PATCH v4 " Junling Zheng
2018-08-08 13:03       ` Chao Yu
2018-08-09  0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 " Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0d7dbbd2-d94a-ccf8-7ef9-80086cf0af7d@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengjunling@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).