From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
To: shifei10.ge@samsung.com
Cc: ?? <shu.tan@samsung.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs:fix truncate_partial_nodes bug
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:21:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382955704.992.91.camel@kjgkr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27929860.72301382948116848.JavaMail.weblogic@epml07>
Hi,
2013-10-28 (월), 08:15 +0000, Shifei Ge:
> truncate_partial_nodes puts pages incorrectly in two cases.note that the value for argc 'depth' can only be 2 or 3(see truncate_inode_blocks --->truncate_partial_nodes ).
> first case:err happened in the first 'for' loop
> assume depth is 2,when err happened,pages[0] is invalid,so this page don't need to be put when func return,there is no problem.
> but when depth is 3 ,pages isn't put correctly when pages[0] is valid and pages[1] is invalid.in this case,depth is set to 2(ref to statemnt depth = i + 1) ,and then 'goto fail'.
> in label 'fail', for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--) cann't meet the condition because i=-1,so pages[0] cann't be put when func return.
> second case:err happened in the second 'for' loop
> now,we've got pages[0] with argc 'depth' is 2 ,or we've got pages[0] and pages[1] with depth is 3.when err happend,we need 'goto fail' to put pages we've got.
> when depth is 2,in label 'fail',for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--) cann't meet the condition because i=-1,so pages[0] cann't be put.
> when depth is 3,in label 'fail',for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--) can only put pages[0],pages[1] also cann't be put.
> notes 'depth' has been changed before first 'goto fail'(ref to statemnt depth = i + 1),so pass this modified 'depth' to trace_f2fs_truncate_partial_nodes is also incorrectly.
Please write a description not to exceed 80 columns.
It's very hard to understand.
>
> From 9de8efa31759ce86a032f5ad092d337b686ede06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Signed-off-by: Shifei Ge <shifei10.ge@samsung.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 304d5ce..9986930 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct dnode_of_data *dn,
> int err = 0;
> int i;
> int idx = depth - 2;
> + int dep = depth;
I think we need to avoid using a local variable only for the use of
tracepoints below.
How about this?
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 304d5ce..8578719 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -631,11 +631,10 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct
dnode_of_data *dn,
return 0;
/* get indirect nodes in the path */
- for (i = 0; i < depth - 1; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < idx + 1; i++) {
/* refernece count'll be increased */
pages[i] = get_node_page(sbi, nid[i]);
if (IS_ERR(pages[i])) {
- depth = i + 1;
err = PTR_ERR(pages[i]);
goto fail;
}
@@ -643,7 +642,7 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct
dnode_of_data *dn,
}
/* free direct nodes linked to a partial indirect node */
- for (i = offset[depth - 1]; i < NIDS_PER_BLOCK; i++) {
+ for (i = offset[idx + 1]; i < NIDS_PER_BLOCK; i++) {
child_nid = get_nid(pages[idx], i, false);
if (!child_nid)
continue;
@@ -654,7 +653,7 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct
dnode_of_data *dn,
set_nid(pages[idx], i, 0, false);
}
- if (offset[depth - 1] == 0) {
+ if (offset[idx + 1] == 0) {
dn->node_page = pages[idx];
dn->nid = nid[idx];
truncate_node(dn);
@@ -662,9 +661,10 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct
dnode_of_data *dn,
f2fs_put_page(pages[idx], 1);
}
offset[idx]++;
- offset[depth - 1] = 0;
+ offset[idx + 1] = 0;
+ idx--;
fail:
- for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--)
+ for (i = idx; i >= 0; i--)
f2fs_put_page(pages[i], 1);
trace_f2fs_truncate_partial_nodes(dn->inode, nid, depth, err);
--
1.8.4.474.g128a96c
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-28 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-28 8:15 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs:fix truncate_partial_nodes bug Shifei Ge
2013-10-28 10:21 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2013-10-29 7:32 ` shifei10.ge
2013-10-29 7:43 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-29 8:07 ` shifei10.ge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382955704.992.91.camel@kjgkr \
--to=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shifei10.ge@samsung.com \
--cc=shu.tan@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).