From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huang Ying Subject: Run xfstests for f2fs Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:30:58 +0800 Message-ID: <1410852658.7804.30.camel@yhuang-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XTnEF-0006g0-IC for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:31:11 +0000 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1XTnE9-00007u-Sg for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:31:11 +0000 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: linux-f2fs-devel Hi, Jaegeuk, xfstests (http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfstests.git) is regression test suite for xfs and other file systems. To run xfstests for f2fs, we need to either - change fsck.f2fs to support "-n", which is default fsck option in xfstests. - change xfstests to call fsck.f2fs without any parameters. I think choosing which solution depends on whether we will implemented a fsck which can repair file system. If so, we can add "-n" to fsck.f2fs. Otherwise, we can change xfstests. Best Regards, Huang, Ying ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk