* [PATCH] f2fs: fix a infinite loop in writting checkpoint
@ 2017-08-26 4:15 Yunlei He
2017-08-28 9:49 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yunlei He @ 2017-08-26 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk, yuchao0, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: heyunlei, morgan.wang
The loop reason is DIRTY IMETA always equal to 1:
Thread A:
-write_checkpoint
-block_operations
-f2fs_sync_inode_meta
-igrab <--- here igrab return NULL
Thread B:
-f2fs_evict_inode
-remove_inode_page
-truncate_xattr_node
-__get_node_page
-read_node_page <---- here return -ENOENT
This patch walk around this cause.
Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 2654c91..ec7a0e0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -973,8 +973,9 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
return 0;
npage = get_node_page(sbi, nid);
- if (IS_ERR(npage))
+ if (IS_ERR(npage) && PTR_ERR(npage) != -ENOENT) {
return PTR_ERR(npage);
+ }
f2fs_i_xnid_write(inode, 0);
--
1.9.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix a infinite loop in writting checkpoint
2017-08-26 4:15 [PATCH] f2fs: fix a infinite loop in writting checkpoint Yunlei He
@ 2017-08-28 9:49 ` Chao Yu
2017-09-01 4:19 ` 答复: " heyunlei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2017-08-28 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yunlei He, jaegeuk, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: morgan.wang
Hi Yunlei,
On 2017/8/26 12:15, Yunlei He wrote:
> The loop reason is DIRTY IMETA always equal to 1:
>
> Thread A:
> -write_checkpoint
> -block_operations
> -f2fs_sync_inode_meta
> -igrab <--- here igrab return NULL
>
> Thread B:
> -f2fs_evict_inode
> -remove_inode_page
> -truncate_xattr_node
> -__get_node_page
> -read_node_page <---- here return -ENOENT
>
> This patch walk around this cause.
It needs to figure out root cause that why xattr node entry is invalid.
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 2654c91..ec7a0e0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,9 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> return 0;
>
> npage = get_node_page(sbi, nid);
> - if (IS_ERR(npage))
> + if (IS_ERR(npage) && PTR_ERR(npage) != -ENOENT) {
> return PTR_ERR(npage);
> + }
>
> f2fs_i_xnid_write(inode, 0);
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* 答复: [PATCH] f2fs: fix a infinite loop in writting checkpoint
2017-08-28 9:49 ` Chao Yu
@ 2017-09-01 4:19 ` heyunlei
2017-09-04 1:24 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: heyunlei @ 2017-09-01 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuchao (T), jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Wangkai (Morgan, Euler)
Hi Yunlei,
On 2017/8/26 12:15, Yunlei He wrote:
> The loop reason is DIRTY IMETA always equal to 1:
>
> Thread A:
> -write_checkpoint
> -block_operations
> -f2fs_sync_inode_meta
> -igrab <--- here igrab return NULL
>
> Thread B:
> -f2fs_evict_inode
> -remove_inode_page
> -truncate_xattr_node
> -__get_node_page
> -read_node_page <---- here return -ENOENT
>
> This patch walk around this cause.
It needs to figure out root cause that why xattr node entry is invalid.
How about this modification:
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index b4c401d..62de5f7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = remove_inode_page(inode);
f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
- if (err == -ENOENT)
+ if (err == -ENOENT && is_bad_inode(inode))
err = 0;
}
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index 2654c91..ec7a0e0
> 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,9 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> return 0;
>
> npage = get_node_page(sbi, nid);
> - if (IS_ERR(npage))
> + if (IS_ERR(npage) && PTR_ERR(npage) != -ENOENT) {
> return PTR_ERR(npage);
> + }
>
> f2fs_i_xnid_write(inode, 0);
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: 答复: [PATCH] f2fs: fix a infinite loop in writting checkpoint
2017-09-01 4:19 ` 答复: " heyunlei
@ 2017-09-04 1:24 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2017-09-04 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heyunlei, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Wangkai (Morgan, Euler)
On 2017/9/1 12:19, heyunlei wrote:
>
> Hi Yunlei,
>
> On 2017/8/26 12:15, Yunlei He wrote:
>> The loop reason is DIRTY IMETA always equal to 1:
>>
>> Thread A:
>> -write_checkpoint
>> -block_operations
>> -f2fs_sync_inode_meta
>> -igrab <--- here igrab return NULL
>>
>> Thread B:
>> -f2fs_evict_inode
>> -remove_inode_page
>> -truncate_xattr_node
>> -__get_node_page
>> -read_node_page <---- here return -ENOENT
>>
>> This patch walk around this cause.
>
> It needs to figure out root cause that why xattr node entry is invalid.
>
> How about this modification:
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index b4c401d..62de5f7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> err = remove_inode_page(inode);
> f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> - if (err == -ENOENT)
> + if (err == -ENOENT && is_bad_inode(inode))
So we expect that before new inode page was allocated, it needs to set bad inode
in time covering all error paths?
Thanks,
> err = 0;
> }
>
> Thanks
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index 2654c91..ec7a0e0
>> 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> @@ -973,8 +973,9 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>> return 0;
>>
>> npage = get_node_page(sbi, nid);
>> - if (IS_ERR(npage))
>> + if (IS_ERR(npage) && PTR_ERR(npage) != -ENOENT) {
>> return PTR_ERR(npage);
>> + }
>>
>> f2fs_i_xnid_write(inode, 0);
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-04 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-26 4:15 [PATCH] f2fs: fix a infinite loop in writting checkpoint Yunlei He
2017-08-28 9:49 ` Chao Yu
2017-09-01 4:19 ` 答复: " heyunlei
2017-09-04 1:24 ` Chao Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).