linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Chao Liu <chaoliu719@gmail.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: introduce two helper functions for the largest cached extent
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:24:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16625fbb-3dc0-34d5-ee75-fe010aa0d9ec@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725013607.4134123-1-chaoliu719@gmail.com>

On 2023/7/25 9:36, Chao Liu wrote:
> From: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com>
> 
> This patch is a cleanup:
> 1. Merge __drop_largest_extent() since it has only one caller.
> 2. Introduce __unlock_tree_with_checking_largest() and
>     __drop_largest_extent() to help manage largest and largest_update
>     in extent_tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com>
> ---
> v2: Make sure et->largest_updated gets updated within &et->lock.
>      Thanks to Chao Yu for pointing out.
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h         |  4 +--
>   2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index 0e2d49140c07f..cfc69621a8a26 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
>   #include "node.h"
>   #include <trace/events/f2fs.h>
>   
> +static void __drop_largest_extent(struct extent_tree *et)
> +{
> +	et->largest.len = 0;
> +	et->largest_updated = true;
> +}
> +
>   bool sanity_check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode)
>   {
>   	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> @@ -35,8 +41,7 @@ bool sanity_check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode)
>   
>   	/* Let's drop, if checkpoint got corrupted. */
>   	if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_ERROR_FLAG)) {
> -		ei->len = 0;
> -		et->largest_updated = true;
> +		__drop_largest_extent(et);

__drop_largest_extent_force(et);

>   		return true;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -310,6 +315,8 @@ static void __detach_extent_node(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   
>   	if (et->cached_en == en)
>   		et->cached_en = NULL;
> +
> +	/* keep the largest as we can still use it */

The comments doesn't match below code?

>   	kmem_cache_free(extent_node_slab, en);
>   }
>   
> @@ -385,15 +392,6 @@ static unsigned int __free_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	return count - atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
>   }
>   
> -static void __drop_largest_extent(struct extent_tree *et,
> -					pgoff_t fofs, unsigned int len)
> -{
> -	if (fofs < et->largest.fofs + et->largest.len &&
> -			fofs + len > et->largest.fofs) {
> -		et->largest.len = 0;
> -		et->largest_updated = true;
> -	}
> -}

What about:

static void __drop_largest_extent_cond(struct extent_tree *et,
					pgoff_t fofs, unsigned int len,
					bool force)
{
	if (force || (fofs < et->largest.fofs + et->largest.len &&
			fofs + len > et->largest.fofs)) {
		et->largest.len = 0;
		et->largest_updated = true;
	}
}

static void __drop_largest_extent_force(struct extent_tree *et)
{
	__drop_largest_extent_cond(et, 0, 0, true);
}

>   
>   void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct page *ipage)
>   {
> @@ -601,6 +599,19 @@ static struct extent_node *__insert_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	return en;
>   }
>   
> +static void __unlock_tree_with_checking_largest(struct extent_tree *et,
> +						struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	if (et->type == EX_READ && et->largest_updated) {
> +		et->largest_updated = false;
> +		write_unlock(&et->lock);
> +		f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	write_unlock(&et->lock);
> +}
> +
>   static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>   			struct extent_info *tei, enum extent_type type)
>   {
> @@ -612,7 +623,6 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>   	struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
>   	unsigned int fofs = tei->fofs, len = tei->len;
>   	unsigned int end = fofs + len;
> -	bool updated = false;
>   	bool leftmost = false;
>   
>   	if (!et)
> @@ -636,11 +646,10 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>   		prev = et->largest;
>   		dei.len = 0;
>   
> -		/*
> -		 * drop largest extent before lookup, in case it's already
> -		 * been shrunk from extent tree
> -		 */
> -		__drop_largest_extent(et, fofs, len);

__drop_largest_extent_cond(et, fofs, len, false);

> +		/* updates may cause largest extent cache to become invalid */
> +		if (fofs < et->largest.fofs + et->largest.len &&
> +		    fofs + len > et->largest.fofs)
> +			__drop_largest_extent(et);
>   	}
>   
>   	/* 1. lookup first extent node in range [fofs, fofs + len - 1] */
> @@ -733,8 +742,7 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>   		if (dei.len >= 1 &&
>   				prev.len < F2FS_MIN_EXTENT_LEN &&
>   				et->largest.len < F2FS_MIN_EXTENT_LEN) {
> -			et->largest.len = 0;
> -			et->largest_updated = true;
> +			__drop_largest_extent(et);

__drop_largest_extent_force(et);

>   			set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
>   		}
>   	}
> @@ -742,10 +750,6 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>   	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
>   		__free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
>   
> -	if (et->largest_updated) {
> -		et->largest_updated = false;
> -		updated = true;
> -	}

I guess we'd better keep previous logic.

>   	goto out_read_extent_cache;
>   update_age_extent_cache:
>   	if (!tei->last_blocks)
> @@ -757,10 +761,7 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>   		__insert_extent_tree(sbi, et, &ei,
>   					insert_p, insert_parent, leftmost);
>   out_read_extent_cache:
> -	write_unlock(&et->lock);
> -
> -	if (updated)
> -		f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);

Ditto,

> +	__unlock_tree_with_checking_largest(et, inode);
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
> @@ -1092,7 +1093,6 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
>   {
>   	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
>   	struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
> -	bool updated = false;
>   
>   	if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, type))
>   		return;
> @@ -1101,14 +1101,10 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
>   	__free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
>   	if (type == EX_READ) {
>   		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
> -		if (et->largest.len) {
> -			et->largest.len = 0;
> -			updated = true;
> -		}
> +		if (et->largest.len)
> +			__drop_largest_extent(et);
>   	}
> -	write_unlock(&et->lock);
> -	if (updated)
> -		f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);

Ditto,

Thanks,

> +	__unlock_tree_with_checking_largest(et, inode);
>   }
>   
>   void f2fs_drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index d372bedb0fe4e..da02e120e5ea6 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ struct extent_tree {
>   
>   struct extent_tree_info {
>   	struct radix_tree_root extent_tree_root;/* cache extent cache entries */
> -	struct mutex extent_tree_lock;	/* locking extent radix tree */
> +	struct mutex extent_tree_lock;		/* locking extent radix tree */
>   	struct list_head extent_list;		/* lru list for shrinker */
>   	spinlock_t extent_lock;			/* locking extent lru list */
>   	atomic_t total_ext_tree;		/* extent tree count */
> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ enum {
>   	FI_ACL_MODE,		/* indicate acl mode */
>   	FI_NO_ALLOC,		/* should not allocate any blocks */
>   	FI_FREE_NID,		/* free allocated nide */
> -	FI_NO_EXTENT,		/* not to use the extent cache */
> +	FI_NO_EXTENT,		/* not to use the read extent cache */
>   	FI_INLINE_XATTR,	/* used for inline xattr */
>   	FI_INLINE_DATA,		/* used for inline data*/
>   	FI_INLINE_DENTRY,	/* used for inline dentry */


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-26  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-25  1:36 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: introduce two helper functions for the largest cached extent Chao Liu
2023-07-26  1:24 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2023-07-26  6:16   ` Chao Liu
2023-08-02 14:41     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16625fbb-3dc0-34d5-ee75-fe010aa0d9ec@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=chaoliu719@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuchao@coolpad.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).