* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: return true if all cmd were issued or no cmd need to be issued for f2fs_issue_discard_timeout()
@ 2023-01-12 19:14 Yangtao Li via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-01-30 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yangtao Li via Linux-f2fs-devel @ 2023-01-12 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk, chao; +Cc: Yangtao Li, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() returns whether discard cmds are dropped,
which does not match the meaning of the function. Let's change it to
return whether all discard cmd are issued.
After commit 4d67490498ac ("f2fs: Don't create discard thread when
device doesn't support realtime discard"), f2fs_issue_discard_timeout()
is alse called by f2fs_remount(). Since the comments of
f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() doesn't make much sense, let's update it.
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 13 ++++++++++---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index bd1cd98fa6eb..9346209b7c94 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1650,7 +1650,14 @@ void f2fs_stop_discard_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
}
}
-/* This comes from f2fs_put_super */
+/**
+ * f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() - Issue all discard cmd within UMOUNT_DISCARD_TIMEOUT
+ * @sbi: the f2fs_sb_info data for discard cmd to issue
+ *
+ * When UMOUNT_DISCARD_TIMEOUT is exceeded, all remaining discard commands will be dropped
+ *
+ * Return true if issued all discard cmd or no discard cmd need issue, otherwise return false.
+ */
bool f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
@@ -1658,7 +1665,7 @@ bool f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
bool dropped;
if (!atomic_read(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt))
- return false;
+ return true;
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_UMOUNT,
dcc->discard_granularity);
@@ -1669,7 +1676,7 @@ bool f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
__wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt));
- return dropped;
+ return !dropped;
}
static int issue_discard_thread(void *data)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 5fc83771042d..8f13798058f4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb);
int i;
- bool dropped;
+ bool done;
/* unregister procfs/sysfs entries in advance to avoid race case */
f2fs_unregister_sysfs(sbi);
@@ -1576,9 +1576,8 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
}
/* be sure to wait for any on-going discard commands */
- dropped = f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(sbi);
-
- if (f2fs_realtime_discard_enable(sbi) && !sbi->discard_blks && !dropped) {
+ done = f2fs_issue_discard_timeout(sbi);
+ if (f2fs_realtime_discard_enable(sbi) && !sbi->discard_blks && done) {
struct cp_control cpc = {
.reason = CP_UMOUNT | CP_TRIMMED,
};
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: return true if all cmd were issued or no cmd need to be issued for f2fs_issue_discard_timeout()
2023-01-12 19:14 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: return true if all cmd were issued or no cmd need to be issued for f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() Yangtao Li via Linux-f2fs-devel
@ 2023-01-30 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs @ 2023-01-30 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yangtao Li; +Cc: jaegeuk, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hello:
This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:14:04 +0800 you wrote:
> f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() returns whether discard cmds are dropped,
> which does not match the meaning of the function. Let's change it to
> return whether all discard cmd are issued.
>
> After commit 4d67490498ac ("f2fs: Don't create discard thread when
> device doesn't support realtime discard"), f2fs_issue_discard_timeout()
> is alse called by f2fs_remount(). Since the comments of
> f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() doesn't make much sense, let's update it.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [f2fs-dev] f2fs: return true if all cmd were issued or no cmd need to be issued for f2fs_issue_discard_timeout()
https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/255699a4d876
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-30 23:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-12 19:14 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: return true if all cmd were issued or no cmd need to be issued for f2fs_issue_discard_timeout() Yangtao Li via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-01-30 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).