From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C023C433EF for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E7660F02; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:51:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D7E7660F02 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhndY-00025e-Kw; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 06:51:12 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhndX-00025Q-HI for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 06:51:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SFlcVyva7g4hYN2JXM+EzozPzbqtYkd4A0qMjC4U/vI=; b=YDZ3CeU98ml76MOEu6G0+w4gMg FGrXOfVqu2zg4MErpyeYsyKKK13qSo3ohBCsgK1+E8lTBfgZVTBmxAKp/XUX4G88Rn9JprExw20XW koRo7ecqd/Pli6oCWYeCdb1dgBMIa4CFep3o+jQKV442XxKwNXMXMVtSQ1el0L0j4ayA=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SFlcVyva7g4hYN2JXM+EzozPzbqtYkd4A0qMjC4U/vI=; b=F0ofKOE0F5T4EBEE6jrVwh6t47 TlyJ2d2uEDZYuDrRxKkvIwCzm6SGJoufoBl2HY4v3e9tMfL4/QswZX7QPBoEsjjzaSG/XiMYrXmTR CjchjSnID7liy7O8KMoF3T1ULyr8LD/H1Tv46woEUs7L/vqMwFgQckMuWftwBLjE9oNo=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1mhndU-00EAUj-70 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 06:51:11 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF20860E8C; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1635835858; bh=0m2h0gxAR4wB7PVa2oQ4sTYz0e/lrZ3V9+uXt+Kp2iQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=V4RIxDv66FDQB9Lz6AzG2yzCDhVK0M+pR1pxC7lLvjwypxqOxy+C1oK1o0OShzvPR 6Bm3jftA0uM9QniEDtQ7pKfQTeJlmSER5ZtsEqUczSS+Fuw96r7wKE+erQ2JnvBG4j Gzjo3b5Nq6ziIE9T3vDa8ZlhKbl6tpRKrYq0SgOTeNsrIeHRi3iwSP4by6mcgWK6eu OT4L8hNtKYxup4GYO8LBKOvMeLbZH8Kzc22S/goWprl/zuojCTiDZk4Uk7CpW73Q7Z WB7QOfqoRqu1gk5rfA0gQFYYLQ+agPc9IEth3E0GW66X1AVIJDaNSHTPdW/NhwawVf G+5kjhYCobM/w== Message-ID: <1f724fcc-6a32-6483-444c-53c78376201d@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:50:54 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Hyeong-Jun Kim , Jaegeuk Kim References: <20211102045949.63530-1-hj514.kim@samsung.com> <9ee5741f-35f8-c0b9-f045-fb70aa49f6de@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1mhndU-00EAUj-70 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] F2FS: invalidate META_MAPPING before IPU/DIO write X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sj1557.seo@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/11/2 14:49, Hyeong-Jun Kim wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 14:47 +0800, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2021/11/2 12:59, Hyeong-Jun Kim wrote: >>> Encrypted pages during GC are read and cached in META_MAPPING. >>> However, due to cached pages in META_MAPPING, there is an issue >>> where >>> newly written pages are lost by IPU or DIO writes. >>> >>> Thread A - f2fs_gc() Thread B >>> /* phase 3 */ >>> down_write(i_gc_rwsem) >>> ra_data_block() ---- (a) >>> up_write(i_gc_rwsem) >>> f2fs_direct_IO() : >>> - down_read(i_gc_rwsem) >>> - __blockdev_direct_io() >>> - get_data_block_dio_write() >>> - f2fs_dio_submit_bio() ---- (b) >>> - up_read(i_gc_rwsem) >>> /* phase 4 */ >>> down_write(i_gc_rwsem) >>> move_data_block() ---- (c) >>> up_write(i_gc_rwsem) >>> >>> (a) In phase 3 of f2fs_gc(), up-to-date page is read from storage >>> and >>> cached in META_MAPPING. >>> (b) In thread B, writing new data by IPU or DIO write on same >>> blkaddr as >>> read in (a). cached page in META_MAPPING become out-dated. >>> (c) In phase 4 of f2fs_gc(), out-dated page in META_MAPPING is >>> copied to >>> new blkaddr. In conclusion, the newly written data in (b) is >>> lost. >>> >>> To address this issue, invalidating pages in META_MAPPING before >>> IPU or >>> DIO write. >>> >>> --- >>> v3: >>> - Use sbi instead of fio->sbi in f2fs_inplace_write_data() >>> v2: >>> - Update patch description with race condition >> >> >> >>> Fixes: 6aa58d8ad20a ("f2fs: readahead encrypted block during GC") >>> Signed-off-by: Hyeong-Jun Kim < >>> hj514.kim@samsung.com >>>> >>> --- >> >> Change log should be attached here, otherwise Fixes & Signed-off-by >> tag will be lost >> after applying this patch. >> >> Thanks, >> > Thanks for your comment. > Should I re-send this patch? Yes, please. :) Thanks, > > Thanks, >>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 ++ >>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++ >>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>> index 74e1a350c1d8..9f754aaef558 100644 >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>> @@ -1708,6 +1708,8 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, >>> struct f2fs_map_blocks *map, >>> */ >>> f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback_range(inode, >>> map->m_pblk, map- >>>> m_len); >>> + invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi), >>> + map->m_pblk, map- >>>> m_pblk); >>> >>> if (map->m_multidev_dio) { >>> block_t blk_addr = map->m_pblk; >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>> index 526423fe84ce..df9ed75f0b7a 100644 >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>> @@ -3652,6 +3652,9 @@ int f2fs_inplace_write_data(struct >>> f2fs_io_info *fio) >>> goto drop_bio; >>> } >>> >>> + invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi), >>> + fio->new_blkaddr, fio->new_blkaddr); >>> + >>> stat_inc_inplace_blocks(fio->sbi); >>> >>> if (fio->bio && !(SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy & (1 << >>> F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE))) >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel