From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:22:38 +0800 Message-ID: <20160812012238.GA47037@jaegeuk> References: <20160718020950.GB4986@yexl-desktop> <87twfmsndf.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <87bn18cvuu.fsf_-_@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <20160804172452.GA12093@jaegeuk> <874m70ctu3.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <20160804185251.GA13813@jaegeuk> <87r3a4b7b6.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <87vaz6yl8a.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vaz6yl8a.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: kernel test robot , lkp@01.org, LKML , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Kim, > > "Huang, Ying" writes: > >> > >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression > >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression > >> > >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure > >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct? > > > > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7. We > > will implement it. > > > > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression > > > > The disk is one 48G ram disk. The steps for aim7 is, > > > > cat > workfile < > FILESIZE: 1M > > POOLSIZE: 10M > > 10 disk_cp > > EOF > > > > ( > > echo $HOSTNAME > > echo disk_cp > > > > echo 1 > > echo 3000 > > echo 2 > > echo 3000 > > echo 1 > > ) | ./multitask -t & > > > > > > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression > > > > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The > > steps for aim7 is, > > > > cat > workfile < > FILESIZE: 1M > > POOLSIZE: 10M > > 10 sync_disk_rw > > EOF > > > > ( > > echo $HOSTNAME > > echo sync_disk_rw > > > > echo 1 > > echo 600 > > echo 2 > > echo 600 > > echo 1 > > ) | ./multitask -t & > > Any update on these 2 regressions? Is the information is enough for you > to reproduce? Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now. I'll check that when back to US. Thanks, > > Best Regards, > Huang, Ying