From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
Cc: heyunlei@huwei.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: walk around a panic caused by nrpages is not zero in clear_inode
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:47:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160907014705.GC10307@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473124652-31921-1-git-send-email-heyunlei@huawei.com>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:17:32AM +0800, Yunlei He wrote:
> I came across a panic twice:
>
> [<ffffffc000088e70>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x124
> [<ffffffc000088fb4>] show_stack+0x14/0x1c
> [<ffffffc000ce1c38>] dump_stack+0x20/0x28
> [<ffffffc000cdfbd4>] panic+0x13c/0x258
> [<ffffffc0001b2244>] clear_inode+0x8c/0xd4
> [<ffffffc00030575c>] f2fs_evict_inode+0x194/0x3e0
> [<ffffffc0001b30b4>] evict+0xa0/0x1cc
> [<ffffffc0001b399c>] iput+0xe4/0x180
> [<ffffffc0003274fc>] recover_fsync_data+0x6ec/0xe5c
> [<ffffffc00030d420>] f2fs_fill_super+0xa5c/0xb9c
> [<ffffffc00019cd00>] mount_bdev+0x1ac/0x1d4
> [<ffffffc00030b66c>] f2fs_mount+0x14/0x1c
> [<ffffffc00019d5e4>] mount_fs+0x3c/0x1bc
> [<ffffffc0001b7560>] vfs_kern_mount+0x4c/0xf0
> [<ffffffc0001b9970>] do_mount+0x218/0x960
> [<ffffffc0001ba148>] SyS_mount+0x90/0xd0
Hmm, could you share the previous recovery messages?
In the truncation part, f2fs_evict_inode starts with setting i_size to zero.
So, the only possible way would be caused by enabled cache_only given by an
inline_data case. But the assumption is that inode must have more than 2
i_blocks, which is not normal case though.
Can we gather more information to narrow down the root cause?
BTW, I found that the below grab_cache_page() should be find_lock_page() to
check its cached page only.
>From a584542d25e7dfc91af53a8f4a4866b939d29fef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:55:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid page allocation for truncating partial
inline_data
When truncating cached inline_data, we don't need to allocate a new page
all the time. Instead, it must check its page cache only.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index a8aa6fd..0144ed4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int truncate_partial_data_page(struct inode *inode, u64 from,
return 0;
if (cache_only) {
- page = f2fs_grab_cache_page(mapping, index, false);
+ page = find_lock_page(mapping, index);
if (page && PageUptodate(page))
goto truncate_out;
f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
--
2.8.3
>
> Here, the nrpages in i_mapping in not zero but one. Maybe it's
> caused by grabing cache page in truncate_partial_data_page. So
> this patch walk around it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 37c24be..7d1c3f3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -561,6 +561,12 @@ static int truncate_partial_data_page(struct inode *inode, u64 from,
> if (!offset && !cache_only)
> return 0;
>
> + if (!offset && inode->i_state & I_FREEING)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (index > F2FS_I_SB(inode)->max_file_blocks)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (cache_only) {
> page = f2fs_grab_cache_page(mapping, index, false);
> if (page && PageUptodate(page))
> --
> 1.9.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-07 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 1:17 [PATCH] f2fs: walk around a panic caused by nrpages is not zero in clear_inode Yunlei He
2016-09-07 1:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-09-07 2:14 ` heyunlei
2016-09-10 1:27 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160907014705.GC10307@jaegeuk \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=heyunlei@huawei.com \
--cc=heyunlei@huwei.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).