linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: fscrypto: improved validation when loading inode encryption metadata
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:26:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915202603.GC52239@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160915201656.grnmcq7f7blljx47@thunk.org>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:16:56PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:24:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > - Validate fscrypt_context.format and fscrypt_context.flags.  If
> >   unrecognized values are set, then the kernel may not know how to
> >   interpret the encrypted file, so it should fail the operation.
> > 
> > - Validate that AES_256_XTS is used for contents and that AES_256_CTS is
> >   used for filenames.  It was previously possible for the kernel to
> >   accept these reversed, though it would have taken manual editing of
> >   the block device.  This was not intended.
> > 
> > - Fail cleanly rather than BUG()-ing if a file has an unexpected type.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

> Thanks, applied.  (I plan to carry Eric's fscrypto changes ext4 git
> tree; Jaeguk, I assume you have no objections?)

No objection.

Thanks,

> 
> 		   	       	       	   	- Ted

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-15 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-12 19:24 [PATCH] fscrypto: improved validation when loading inode encryption metadata Eric Biggers
2016-09-15 20:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-09-15 20:26   ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160915202603.GC52239@jaegeuk \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).