* [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: clean up nid list operation
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 14:31 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation Chao Yu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Introduce new help __insert_nid_to_list and __remove_nid_from_list to
clean up nid list related codes.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
fs/f2fs/node.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index a1725a9..ea9ff8c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1698,10 +1698,40 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
struct free_nid *i)
{
- list_del(&i->list);
radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
}
+static void __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+ struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+{
+ struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
+
+ if (list == FREE_NID_LIST) {
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state != NID_NEW);
+ nm_i->free_nid_cnt++;
+ list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
+ } else {
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state != NID_ALLOC);
+ nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt++;
+ list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->alloc_nid_list);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+ struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+{
+ struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
+
+ if (list == FREE_NID_LIST) {
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state != NID_NEW);
+ nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
+ } else {
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state != NID_ALLOC);
+ nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
+ }
+ list_del(&i->list);
+}
+
static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
@@ -1739,8 +1769,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
return 0;
}
- list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
- nm_i->free_nid_cnt++;
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
radix_tree_preload_end();
return 1;
@@ -1755,8 +1784,8 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
- nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
need_free = true;
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
@@ -1867,12 +1896,11 @@ retry:
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list_empty(&nm_i->free_nid_list));
i = list_first_entry(&nm_i->free_nid_list,
struct free_nid, list);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state != NID_NEW);
*nid = i->nid;
+
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
i->state = NID_ALLOC;
- nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
- nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt++;
- list_move_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->alloc_nid_list);
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
return true;
}
@@ -1895,9 +1923,9 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i || i->state != NID_ALLOC);
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
- nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1917,16 +1945,16 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i || i->state != NID_ALLOC);
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
+
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
+
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
- nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
need_free = true;
} else {
i->state = NID_NEW;
- nm_i->free_nid_cnt++;
- nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
- list_move_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
@@ -1951,11 +1979,10 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
if (nr_shrink <= 0 || nm_i->free_nid_cnt <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
break;
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state == NID_ALLOC);
-
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
- nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
nr_shrink--;
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
@@ -2340,9 +2367,8 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
/* destroy free nid list */
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state == NID_ALLOC);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
- nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
index 66928d7..a4ee774 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
@@ -158,6 +158,11 @@ enum nid_state {
NID_ALLOC /* it is allocated */
};
+enum nid_list {
+ FREE_NID_LIST,
+ ALLOC_NID_LIST
+};
+
struct free_nid {
struct list_head list; /* for free node id list */
nid_t nid; /* node id */
--
2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: clean up nid list operation Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 14:31 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs Chao Yu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index ea9ff8c..92c9aa4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1689,13 +1689,19 @@ const struct address_space_operations f2fs_node_aops = {
#endif
};
-static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
+static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
nid_t n)
{
return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
}
-static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
+static int __insert_to_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
+ struct free_nid *i)
+{
+ return radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
+}
+
+static void __del_from_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
struct free_nid *i)
{
radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
@@ -1763,7 +1769,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
}
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
- if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
+ if (__insert_to_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i)) {
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
radix_tree_preload_end();
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1782,10 +1788,10 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
bool need_free = false;
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
- i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
+ i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
need_free = true;
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
@@ -1922,10 +1928,10 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
struct free_nid *i;
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
- i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
+ i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1944,13 +1950,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
return;
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
- i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
+ i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
need_free = true;
} else {
i->state = NID_NEW;
@@ -1980,7 +1986,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
break;
__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
nr_shrink--;
@@ -2368,7 +2374,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
--
2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 17:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-12 15:14 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-10-11 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Chao,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>
> Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related
operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to
be a singled one-way list.
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index ea9ff8c..92c9aa4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1689,13 +1689,19 @@ const struct address_space_operations f2fs_node_aops = {
> #endif
> };
>
> -static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> +static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> nid_t n)
> {
> return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
> }
>
> -static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> +static int __insert_to_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> + struct free_nid *i)
> +{
> + return radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> +}
> +
> +static void __del_from_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> struct free_nid *i)
> {
> radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
> @@ -1763,7 +1769,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
> }
>
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> - if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
> + if (__insert_to_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i)) {
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> radix_tree_preload_end();
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> @@ -1782,10 +1788,10 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> bool need_free = false;
>
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
> if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
> need_free = true;
> }
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> @@ -1922,10 +1928,10 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> struct free_nid *i;
>
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> @@ -1944,13 +1950,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> return;
>
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
>
> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
>
> if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
> need_free = true;
> } else {
> i->state = NID_NEW;
> @@ -1980,7 +1986,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
> break;
>
> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
>
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> nr_shrink--;
> @@ -2368,7 +2374,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> --
> 2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
2016-10-11 17:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-10-12 15:14 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-12 17:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-12 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2016/10/12 1:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>
>> Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
>
> Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related
> operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to
This is because we do not record any nids which has been allocated to node
blocks, otherwise we will recored the status of nid in the cache and also it can
be hitted during lookup.
In original patches, free_nid_list is split to two separate lists: free_nid_list
and alloc_nid_list, __lookup_free_nid_list looks like just search the first one,
so in order to avoid misunderstanding, I proposal this change.
Anyway, what about using __{lookup,insert_to,remove_from}_nid_list instead?
Thanks,
> be a singled one-way list.
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> index ea9ff8c..92c9aa4 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> @@ -1689,13 +1689,19 @@ const struct address_space_operations f2fs_node_aops = {
>> #endif
>> };
>>
>> -static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>> +static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>> nid_t n)
>> {
>> return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
>> }
>>
>> -static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>> +static int __insert_to_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>> + struct free_nid *i)
>> +{
>> + return radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __del_from_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>> struct free_nid *i)
>> {
>> radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
>> @@ -1763,7 +1769,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
>> }
>>
>> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> - if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
>> + if (__insert_to_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i)) {
>> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> radix_tree_preload_end();
>> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>> @@ -1782,10 +1788,10 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>> bool need_free = false;
>>
>> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>> + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
>> if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
>> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
>> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
>> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
>> need_free = true;
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> @@ -1922,10 +1928,10 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>> struct free_nid *i;
>>
>> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>> + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
>> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
>> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
>> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
>> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
>> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>>
>> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>> @@ -1944,13 +1950,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>> return;
>>
>> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>> + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid);
>> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
>>
>> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
>>
>> if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
>> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
>> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
>> need_free = true;
>> } else {
>> i->state = NID_NEW;
>> @@ -1980,7 +1986,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
>> break;
>>
>> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
>> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
>> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
>>
>> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>> nr_shrink--;
>> @@ -2368,7 +2374,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
>> __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
>> - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
>> + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i);
>> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>> --
>> 2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
2016-10-12 15:14 ` Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-12 17:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-13 10:26 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-10-12 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:14:42PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2016/10/12 1:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
> >
> > Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related
> > operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to
>
> This is because we do not record any nids which has been allocated to node
> blocks, otherwise we will recored the status of nid in the cache and also it can
> be hitted during lookup.
>
> In original patches, free_nid_list is split to two separate lists: free_nid_list
> and alloc_nid_list, __lookup_free_nid_list looks like just search the first one,
> so in order to avoid misunderstanding, I proposal this change.
>
> Anyway, what about using __{lookup,insert_to,remove_from}_nid_list instead?
Then, how about this one?
>From 4f4b48de34ffaf94baa2065bcd5d44566f8d25b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:09:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: clean up free nid list operations
This patch cleans up to use consistent free nid list ops.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 54d1c49..3d2e259 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1698,25 +1698,26 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
}
-static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
- struct free_nid *i)
-{
- radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
-}
-
-static void __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+static int __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+ struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool new)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
+ if (new) {
+ int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list == FREE_NID_LIST ? i->state != NID_NEW :
i->state != NID_ALLOC);
nm_i->nid_cnt[list]++;
list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->nid_list[list]);
+ return 0;
}
static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+ struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool reuse)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
@@ -1724,6 +1725,8 @@ static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
i->state != NID_ALLOC);
nm_i->nid_cnt[list]--;
list_del(&i->list);
+ if (!reuse)
+ radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
}
static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
@@ -1731,6 +1734,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
struct free_nid *i;
struct nat_entry *ne;
+ int err;
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
return -1;
@@ -1757,15 +1761,13 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
}
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
- if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
- spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
- radix_tree_preload_end();
+ err = __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
+ radix_tree_preload_end();
+ if (err) {
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
return 0;
}
- __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
- radix_tree_preload_end();
return 1;
}
@@ -1778,8 +1780,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
need_free = true;
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -1899,9 +1900,9 @@ retry:
struct free_nid, list);
*nid = i->nid;
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
i->state = NID_ALLOC;
- __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
return true;
}
@@ -1923,8 +1924,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1946,14 +1946,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
-
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
need_free = true;
} else {
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, true);
i->state = NID_NEW;
- __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -1980,9 +1979,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
break;
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
-
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
nr_shrink--;
}
@@ -2369,8 +2366,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->nid_list[FREE_NID_LIST],
list) {
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
--
2.8.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
2016-10-12 17:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-10-13 10:26 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-13 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
On 2016/10/13 1:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Then, how about this one?
>
>>From 4f4b48de34ffaf94baa2065bcd5d44566f8d25b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:09:59 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: clean up free nid list operations
>
> This patch cleans up to use consistent free nid list ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: clean up nid list operation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 14:31 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:20 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation Chao Yu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Add to show pending allocated nids count in debugfs.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/debug.c | 7 ++++---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
index 9789138..05a70b4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
si->dirty_nats = NM_I(sbi)->dirty_nat_cnt;
si->sits = MAIN_SEGS(sbi);
si->dirty_sits = SIT_I(sbi)->dirty_sentries;
- si->fnids = NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt;
+ si->free_nids = NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt;
+ si->alloc_nids = NM_I(sbi)->alloc_nid_cnt;
si->bg_gc = sbi->bg_gc;
si->util_free = (int)(free_user_blocks(sbi) >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg)
* 100 / (int)(sbi->user_block_count >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg)
@@ -325,8 +326,8 @@ static int stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
si->ndirty_imeta);
seq_printf(s, " - NATs: %9d/%9d\n - SITs: %9d/%9d\n",
si->dirty_nats, si->nats, si->dirty_sits, si->sits);
- seq_printf(s, " - free_nids: %9d\n",
- si->fnids);
+ seq_printf(s, " - free_nids: %9d, alloc_nids: %9d\n",
+ si->free_nids, si->alloc_nids);
seq_puts(s, "\nDistribution of User Blocks:");
seq_puts(s, " [ valid | invalid | free ]\n");
seq_puts(s, " [");
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index d6dff15..a726e47 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ struct f2fs_stat_info {
s64 ndirty_node, ndirty_dent, ndirty_meta, ndirty_data, ndirty_imeta;
s64 inmem_pages;
unsigned int ndirty_dirs, ndirty_files, ndirty_all;
- int nats, dirty_nats, sits, dirty_sits, fnids;
+ int nats, dirty_nats, sits, dirty_sits, free_nids, alloc_nids;
int total_count, utilization;
int bg_gc, wb_bios;
int inline_xattr, inline_inode, inline_dir, orphans;
--
2.10.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 17:20 ` Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-10-11 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Chao,
This must be merged into original split patch (maybe representing a list array).
Thanks,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:33PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>
> Add to show pending allocated nids count in debugfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/debug.c | 7 ++++---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> index 9789138..05a70b4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> si->dirty_nats = NM_I(sbi)->dirty_nat_cnt;
> si->sits = MAIN_SEGS(sbi);
> si->dirty_sits = SIT_I(sbi)->dirty_sentries;
> - si->fnids = NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt;
> + si->free_nids = NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt;
> + si->alloc_nids = NM_I(sbi)->alloc_nid_cnt;
> si->bg_gc = sbi->bg_gc;
> si->util_free = (int)(free_user_blocks(sbi) >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg)
> * 100 / (int)(sbi->user_block_count >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg)
> @@ -325,8 +326,8 @@ static int stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> si->ndirty_imeta);
> seq_printf(s, " - NATs: %9d/%9d\n - SITs: %9d/%9d\n",
> si->dirty_nats, si->nats, si->dirty_sits, si->sits);
> - seq_printf(s, " - free_nids: %9d\n",
> - si->fnids);
> + seq_printf(s, " - free_nids: %9d, alloc_nids: %9d\n",
> + si->free_nids, si->alloc_nids);
> seq_puts(s, "\nDistribution of User Blocks:");
> seq_puts(s, " [ valid | invalid | free ]\n");
> seq_puts(s, " [");
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index d6dff15..a726e47 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ struct f2fs_stat_info {
> s64 ndirty_node, ndirty_dent, ndirty_meta, ndirty_data, ndirty_imeta;
> s64 inmem_pages;
> unsigned int ndirty_dirs, ndirty_files, ndirty_all;
> - int nats, dirty_nats, sits, dirty_sits, fnids;
> + int nats, dirty_nats, sits, dirty_sits, free_nids, alloc_nids;
> int total_count, utilization;
> int bg_gc, wb_bios;
> int inline_xattr, inline_inode, inline_dir, orphans;
> --
> 2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 14:31 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] f2fs: don't interrupt free nids building during nid allocation Chao Yu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
During nid allocation, it needs to exclude building and allocating flow
of free nids, this is because while building free nid cache, there are two
steps: a) load free nids from unused nat entries in NAT pages, b) update
free nid cache by checking nat journal. The two steps should be atomical,
otherwise an used nid can be allocated as free one after a) and before b).
This patch adds missing lock which covers build_free_nids in
unlock_operation and f2fs_balance_fs_bg to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 92c9aa4..c68e92d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
}
}
-void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
@@ -1878,6 +1878,13 @@ void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
nm_i->ra_nid_pages, META_NAT, false);
}
+void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->build_lock);
+ __build_free_nids(sbi);
+ mutex_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->build_lock);
+}
+
/*
* If this function returns success, caller can obtain a new nid
* from second parameter of this function.
@@ -1913,9 +1920,7 @@ retry:
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
/* Let's scan nat pages and its caches to get free nids */
- mutex_lock(&nm_i->build_lock);
build_free_nids(sbi);
- mutex_unlock(&nm_i->build_lock);
goto retry;
}
--
2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 17:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-10-11 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
Applied.
Thanks,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:34PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>
> During nid allocation, it needs to exclude building and allocating flow
> of free nids, this is because while building free nid cache, there are two
> steps: a) load free nids from unused nat entries in NAT pages, b) update
> free nid cache by checking nat journal. The two steps should be atomical,
> otherwise an used nid can be allocated as free one after a) and before b).
>
> This patch adds missing lock which covers build_free_nids in
> unlock_operation and f2fs_balance_fs_bg to avoid that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 92c9aa4..c68e92d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> }
> }
>
> -void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
> @@ -1878,6 +1878,13 @@ void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> nm_i->ra_nid_pages, META_NAT, false);
> }
>
> +void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->build_lock);
> + __build_free_nids(sbi);
> + mutex_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->build_lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * If this function returns success, caller can obtain a new nid
> * from second parameter of this function.
> @@ -1913,9 +1920,7 @@ retry:
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>
> /* Let's scan nat pages and its caches to get free nids */
> - mutex_lock(&nm_i->build_lock);
> build_free_nids(sbi);
> - mutex_unlock(&nm_i->build_lock);
> goto retry;
> }
>
> --
> 2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6/7] f2fs: don't interrupt free nids building during nid allocation
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 14:31 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] f2fs: avoid casted negative value as shrink count Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Jaegeuk Kim
6 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Let build_free_nids support sync/async methods, in allocation flow of nids,
we use synchronuous method, so that we can avoid looping in alloc_nid when
free memory is low; in unblock_operations and f2fs_balance_fs_bg we use
asynchronuous method in where low memory condition can interrupt us.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/node.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 7e9b504..eacc697 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static void unblock_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
up_write(&sbi->node_write);
- build_free_nids(sbi);
+ build_free_nids(sbi, false);
f2fs_unlock_all(sbi);
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index a726e47..ce34b5f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -2056,7 +2056,7 @@ void move_node_page(struct page *, int);
int fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct inode *,
struct writeback_control *, bool);
int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct writeback_control *);
-void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
+void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *, bool);
bool alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t *);
void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t);
void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index c68e92d..0a9692e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1744,9 +1744,6 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
struct free_nid *i;
struct nat_entry *ne;
- if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
- return -1;
-
/* 0 nid should not be used */
if (unlikely(nid == 0))
return 0;
@@ -1817,14 +1814,12 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
- if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR) {
- if (add_free_nid(sbi, start_nid, true) < 0)
- break;
- }
+ if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
+ add_free_nid(sbi, start_nid, true);
}
}
-void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
@@ -1836,6 +1831,9 @@ void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
if (nm_i->free_nid_cnt >= NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK)
return;
+ if (!sync && !available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
+ return;
+
/* readahead nat pages to be scanned */
ra_meta_pages(sbi, NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(nid), FREE_NID_PAGES,
META_NAT, true);
@@ -1878,10 +1876,10 @@ void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
nm_i->ra_nid_pages, META_NAT, false);
}
-void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync)
{
mutex_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->build_lock);
- __build_free_nids(sbi);
+ __build_free_nids(sbi, sync);
mutex_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->build_lock);
}
@@ -1920,7 +1918,7 @@ retry:
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
/* Let's scan nat pages and its caches to get free nids */
- build_free_nids(sbi);
+ build_free_nids(sbi, true);
goto retry;
}
@@ -2359,7 +2357,7 @@ int build_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
if (err)
return err;
- build_free_nids(sbi);
+ build_free_nids(sbi, true);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index fc886f0..7f62dd0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void f2fs_balance_fs_bg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
try_to_free_nids(sbi, MAX_FREE_NIDS);
else
- build_free_nids(sbi);
+ build_free_nids(sbi, false);
/* checkpoint is the only way to shrink partial cached entries */
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, NAT_ENTRIES) ||
--
2.10.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7/7] f2fs: avoid casted negative value as shrink count
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] f2fs: don't interrupt free nids building during nid allocation Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 14:31 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Jaegeuk Kim
6 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-11 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
This patch makes sure it returns a positive value instead of a probable
casted negative value as shrink count.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/shrinker.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
index 8b0a112..e1220f2 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
@@ -21,14 +21,16 @@ static unsigned int shrinker_run_no;
static unsigned long __count_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
- return NM_I(sbi)->nat_cnt - NM_I(sbi)->dirty_nat_cnt;
+ long count = NM_I(sbi)->nat_cnt - NM_I(sbi)->dirty_nat_cnt;
+
+ return count > 0 ? count : 0;
}
static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
- if (NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt > MAX_FREE_NIDS)
- return NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt - MAX_FREE_NIDS;
- return 0;
+ long count = NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt - MAX_FREE_NIDS;
+
+ return count > 0 ? count : 0;
}
static unsigned long __count_extent_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
--
2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] f2fs: avoid casted negative value as shrink count Chao Yu
@ 2016-10-11 17:09 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-12 1:14 ` Chao Yu
6 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-10-11 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Chao,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:30PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>
> During free nid allocation, in order to do preallocation, we will tag free
> nid entry as allocated one and still leave it in free nid list, for other
> allocators who want to grab free nids, it needs to traverse the free nid
> list for lookup. It becomes overhead in scenario of allocating free nid
> intensively by multithreads.
>
> This patch splits free nid list to two list: {free,alloc}_nid_list, to
> keep free nids and preallocated free nids separately, after that, traverse
> latency will be gone.
How about adding a list array like this?
enum {
ALLOC_NID_LIST,
FREE_NID_LIST,
MAX_NID_LIST,
};
struct list_head nid_list[MAX_NID_LIST];
Oh, there is another clean-up patch which defines this enum.
IMO, it'd be good to write one patch including split and clean-up together.
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/debug.c | 5 +++--
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +++-
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> fs/f2fs/node.h | 2 +-
> fs/f2fs/shrinker.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> index fb245bd..9789138 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> si->dirty_nats = NM_I(sbi)->dirty_nat_cnt;
> si->sits = MAIN_SEGS(sbi);
> si->dirty_sits = SIT_I(sbi)->dirty_sentries;
> - si->fnids = NM_I(sbi)->fcnt;
> + si->fnids = NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt;
> si->bg_gc = sbi->bg_gc;
> si->util_free = (int)(free_user_blocks(sbi) >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg)
> * 100 / (int)(sbi->user_block_count >> sbi->log_blocks_per_seg)
> @@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ get_cache:
> si->cache_mem += sizeof(struct flush_cmd_control);
>
> /* free nids */
> - si->cache_mem += NM_I(sbi)->fcnt * sizeof(struct free_nid);
> + si->cache_mem += (NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt + NM_I(sbi)->alloc_nid_cnt) *
> + sizeof(struct free_nid);
> si->cache_mem += NM_I(sbi)->nat_cnt * sizeof(struct nat_entry);
> si->cache_mem += NM_I(sbi)->dirty_nat_cnt *
> sizeof(struct nat_entry_set);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index d868175..d6dff15 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -543,8 +543,10 @@ struct f2fs_nm_info {
> /* free node ids management */
> struct radix_tree_root free_nid_root;/* root of the free_nid cache */
> struct list_head free_nid_list; /* a list for free nids */
> + struct list_head alloc_nid_list;/* a list for allocating nids */
> spinlock_t free_nid_list_lock; /* protect free nid list */
> - unsigned int fcnt; /* the number of free node id */
> + unsigned int free_nid_cnt; /* the number of free node id */
> + unsigned int alloc_nid_cnt; /* the number of allocating node id */
> struct mutex build_lock; /* lock for build free nids */
>
> /* for checkpoint */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 8831035..a1725a9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> * give 25%, 25%, 50%, 50%, 50% memory for each components respectively
> */
> if (type == FREE_NIDS) {
> - mem_size = (nm_i->fcnt * sizeof(struct free_nid)) >>
> + mem_size = (nm_i->free_nid_cnt * sizeof(struct free_nid)) >>
> PAGE_SHIFT;
> res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 2);
> } else if (type == NAT_ENTRIES) {
> @@ -1740,14 +1740,15 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
> return 0;
> }
> list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
> - nm_i->fcnt++;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt++;
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> radix_tree_preload_end();
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid)
> +static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> {
> + struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> struct free_nid *i;
> bool need_free = false;
>
> @@ -1755,7 +1756,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid)
> i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
> __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> - nm_i->fcnt--;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
> need_free = true;
> }
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> @@ -1797,7 +1798,7 @@ void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> nid_t nid = nm_i->next_scan_nid;
>
> /* Enough entries */
> - if (nm_i->fcnt >= NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK)
> + if (nm_i->free_nid_cnt >= NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK)
> return;
>
> /* readahead nat pages to be scanned */
> @@ -1833,7 +1834,7 @@ void build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> if (addr == NULL_ADDR)
> add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true);
> else
> - remove_free_nid(nm_i, nid);
> + remove_free_nid(sbi, nid);
> }
> up_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
> up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> @@ -1862,16 +1863,16 @@ retry:
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>
> /* We should not use stale free nids created by build_free_nids */
> - if (nm_i->fcnt && !on_build_free_nids(nm_i)) {
> + if (nm_i->free_nid_cnt && !on_build_free_nids(nm_i)) {
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list_empty(&nm_i->free_nid_list));
> - list_for_each_entry(i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list)
> - if (i->state == NID_NEW)
> - break;
> -
> + i = list_first_entry(&nm_i->free_nid_list,
> + struct free_nid, list);
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state != NID_NEW);
> *nid = i->nid;
> i->state = NID_ALLOC;
> - nm_i->fcnt--;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
> + nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt++;
> + list_move_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->alloc_nid_list);
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> return true;
> }
> @@ -1896,6 +1897,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i || i->state != NID_ALLOC);
> __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> + nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> @@ -1917,11 +1919,14 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i || i->state != NID_ALLOC);
> if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
> + nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
> __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> need_free = true;
> } else {
> i->state = NID_NEW;
> - nm_i->fcnt++;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt++;
> + nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt--;
> + list_move_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
> }
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>
> @@ -1935,7 +1940,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
> struct free_nid *i, *next;
> int nr = nr_shrink;
>
> - if (nm_i->fcnt <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> + if (nm_i->free_nid_cnt <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> return 0;
>
> if (!mutex_trylock(&nm_i->build_lock))
> @@ -1943,13 +1948,14 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
>
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> - if (nr_shrink <= 0 || nm_i->fcnt <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> + if (nr_shrink <= 0 || nm_i->free_nid_cnt <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> break;
> - if (i->state == NID_ALLOC)
> - continue;
> +
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state == NID_ALLOC);
> +
> __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> - nm_i->fcnt--;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
> nr_shrink--;
> }
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> @@ -2008,7 +2014,7 @@ recover_xnid:
> if (unlikely(!inc_valid_node_count(sbi, inode)))
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
>
> - remove_free_nid(NM_I(sbi), new_xnid);
> + remove_free_nid(sbi, new_xnid);
> get_node_info(sbi, new_xnid, &ni);
> ni.ino = inode->i_ino;
> set_node_addr(sbi, &ni, NEW_ADDR, false);
> @@ -2038,7 +2044,7 @@ retry:
> }
>
> /* Should not use this inode from free nid list */
> - remove_free_nid(NM_I(sbi), ino);
> + remove_free_nid(sbi, ino);
>
> if (!PageUptodate(ipage))
> SetPageUptodate(ipage);
> @@ -2272,7 +2278,8 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> /* not used nids: 0, node, meta, (and root counted as valid node) */
> nm_i->available_nids = nm_i->max_nid - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM;
> - nm_i->fcnt = 0;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt = 0;
> + nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt = 0;
> nm_i->nat_cnt = 0;
> nm_i->ram_thresh = DEF_RAM_THRESHOLD;
> nm_i->ra_nid_pages = DEF_RA_NID_PAGES;
> @@ -2280,6 +2287,7 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&nm_i->free_nid_root, GFP_ATOMIC);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nm_i->free_nid_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nm_i->alloc_nid_list);
> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&nm_i->nat_root, GFP_NOIO);
> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&nm_i->nat_set_root, GFP_NOIO);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nm_i->nat_entries);
> @@ -2334,12 +2342,14 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, i->state == NID_ALLOC);
> __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
> - nm_i->fcnt--;
> + nm_i->free_nid_cnt--;
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> }
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nm_i->fcnt);
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nm_i->free_nid_cnt);
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nm_i->alloc_nid_cnt);
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !list_empty(&nm_i->alloc_nid_list));
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
>
> /* destroy nat cache */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> index 868bec6..66928d7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static inline void next_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid)
> struct free_nid *fnid;
>
> spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> - if (nm_i->fcnt <= 0) {
> + if (nm_i->free_nid_cnt <= 0) {
> spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> index 46c9154..8b0a112 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ static unsigned long __count_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> - if (NM_I(sbi)->fcnt > MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> - return NM_I(sbi)->fcnt - MAX_FREE_NIDS;
> + if (NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt > MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> + return NM_I(sbi)->free_nid_cnt - MAX_FREE_NIDS;
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.10.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list
2016-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-10-12 1:14 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-10-12 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2016/10/12 1:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:30PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>
>> During free nid allocation, in order to do preallocation, we will tag free
>> nid entry as allocated one and still leave it in free nid list, for other
>> allocators who want to grab free nids, it needs to traverse the free nid
>> list for lookup. It becomes overhead in scenario of allocating free nid
>> intensively by multithreads.
>>
>> This patch splits free nid list to two list: {free,alloc}_nid_list, to
>> keep free nids and preallocated free nids separately, after that, traverse
>> latency will be gone.
>
> How about adding a list array like this?
>
> enum {
> ALLOC_NID_LIST,
> FREE_NID_LIST,
> MAX_NID_LIST,
> };
>
> struct list_head nid_list[MAX_NID_LIST];
>
> Oh, there is another clean-up patch which defines this enum.
> IMO, it'd be good to write one patch including split and clean-up together.
OK, let me merge those patches as you reminded.
thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread