From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20161011171903.GB82199@jaegeuk> References: <20161011143136.2107-1-chao@kernel.org> <20161011143136.2107-3-chao@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bu0i4-0005bO-Fd for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:19:24 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1bu0i2-00021T-8r for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:19:24 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161011143136.2107-3-chao@kernel.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Chao, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change. Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to be a singled one-way list. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/node.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c > index ea9ff8c..92c9aa4 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c > @@ -1689,13 +1689,19 @@ const struct address_space_operations f2fs_node_aops = { > #endif > }; > > -static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, > +static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, > nid_t n) > { > return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n); > } > > -static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, > +static int __insert_to_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, > + struct free_nid *i) > +{ > + return radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i); > +} > + > +static void __del_from_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, > struct free_nid *i) > { > radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid); > @@ -1763,7 +1769,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build) > } > > spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > - if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) { > + if (__insert_to_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i)) { > spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > radix_tree_preload_end(); > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i); > @@ -1782,10 +1788,10 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid) > bool need_free = false; > > spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid); > + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid); > if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) { > __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST); > - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i); > + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i); > need_free = true; > } > spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > @@ -1922,10 +1928,10 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid) > struct free_nid *i; > > spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid); > + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid); > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i); > __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST); > - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i); > + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i); > spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i); > @@ -1944,13 +1950,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid) > return; > > spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > - i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid); > + i = __lookup_free_nid_cache(nm_i, nid); > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i); > > __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST); > > if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) { > - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i); > + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i); > need_free = true; > } else { > i->state = NID_NEW; > @@ -1980,7 +1986,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink) > break; > > __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST); > - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i); > + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i); > > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i); > nr_shrink--; > @@ -2368,7 +2374,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) { > __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST); > - __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i); > + __del_from_free_nid_cache(nm_i, i); > spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i); > spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock); > -- > 2.10.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot