From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:15:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012171548.GA98211@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1825a12-726f-4d79-b15b-3614d92d6897@kernel.org>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:14:42PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2016/10/12 1:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
> >
> > Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related
> > operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to
>
> This is because we do not record any nids which has been allocated to node
> blocks, otherwise we will recored the status of nid in the cache and also it can
> be hitted during lookup.
>
> In original patches, free_nid_list is split to two separate lists: free_nid_list
> and alloc_nid_list, __lookup_free_nid_list looks like just search the first one,
> so in order to avoid misunderstanding, I proposal this change.
>
> Anyway, what about using __{lookup,insert_to,remove_from}_nid_list instead?
Then, how about this one?
>From 4f4b48de34ffaf94baa2065bcd5d44566f8d25b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:09:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: clean up free nid list operations
This patch cleans up to use consistent free nid list ops.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 54d1c49..3d2e259 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1698,25 +1698,26 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
}
-static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
- struct free_nid *i)
-{
- radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
-}
-
-static void __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+static int __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+ struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool new)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
+ if (new) {
+ int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list == FREE_NID_LIST ? i->state != NID_NEW :
i->state != NID_ALLOC);
nm_i->nid_cnt[list]++;
list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->nid_list[list]);
+ return 0;
}
static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+ struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool reuse)
{
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
@@ -1724,6 +1725,8 @@ static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
i->state != NID_ALLOC);
nm_i->nid_cnt[list]--;
list_del(&i->list);
+ if (!reuse)
+ radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
}
static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
@@ -1731,6 +1734,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
struct free_nid *i;
struct nat_entry *ne;
+ int err;
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
return -1;
@@ -1757,15 +1761,13 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
}
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
- if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
- spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
- radix_tree_preload_end();
+ err = __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
+ radix_tree_preload_end();
+ if (err) {
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
return 0;
}
- __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
- radix_tree_preload_end();
return 1;
}
@@ -1778,8 +1780,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
need_free = true;
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -1899,9 +1900,9 @@ retry:
struct free_nid, list);
*nid = i->nid;
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
i->state = NID_ALLOC;
- __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
return true;
}
@@ -1923,8 +1924,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1946,14 +1946,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
-
if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
need_free = true;
} else {
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, true);
i->state = NID_NEW;
- __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+ __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
}
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -1980,9 +1979,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
break;
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
-
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
nr_shrink--;
}
@@ -2369,8 +2366,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->nid_list[FREE_NID_LIST],
list) {
- __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
- __del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+ __remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
--
2.8.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: clean up nid list operation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-12 15:14 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-12 17:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-10-13 10:26 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:20 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] f2fs: don't interrupt free nids building during nid allocation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] f2fs: avoid casted negative value as shrink count Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-12 1:14 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161012171548.GA98211@jaegeuk \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).