linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:57:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014165700.GA67182@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ed5607f-0fe6-02cb-8c95-782913e65b5b@kernel.org>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:25:59PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/10/14 1:14, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:33:19PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2016/10/13 7:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> This patch fixes using a wrong pointer for sum_page in f2fs_gc.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  fs/f2fs/gc.c | 10 +++++-----
> >>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> index e48142f..9c18917 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> @@ -854,16 +854,16 @@ static int do_garbage_collect(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>  
> >>>  	for (segno = start_segno; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
> >>>  
> >>> -		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
> >>> -					unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>> -			goto next;
> >>> -
> >>>  		/* find segment summary of victim */
> >>>  		sum_page = find_get_page(META_MAPPING(sbi),
> >>>  					GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
> >>> -		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !PageUptodate(sum_page));
> >>>  		f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0);
> >>>  
> >>> +		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, 1) == 0 ||
> >>> +				!PageUptodate(sum_page) ||
> >>
> >> Why uptodate flag of summary page can be cleared? someone truncates it?
> > 
> > Well, it looks like no problem to remove this, since it will hit
> > f2fs_cp_error(). I just intended to handle the above f2fs_bug_on here.
> 
> If summary page becomes non-uptodate, it seems there is a bug in vfs/mm/f2fs,
> why not keep it there to detect bug?

I found that the above get_sum_page() loop can give a page which is not uptodate
caused by EIO. Then, we would get the above bug_on, if we move f2fs_cp_error()
case like this patch.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-14 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12 23:23 [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong sum_page pointer in f2fs_gc Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-13 10:33 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-13 17:14   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-14 13:25     ` Chao Yu
2016-10-14 16:57       ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-10-23 12:26         ` Chao Yu
2016-10-23 21:40           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-24  2:55             ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161014165700.GA67182@jaegeuk \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).