From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>,
Weichao Guo <guoweichao@huawei.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: hide a maybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:34:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102163439.GA48728@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161102135226.2753644-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Replaced with this.
Thanks, Arnd & Chao, ;)
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:52:15PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
> without a prior initialization:
>
> fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’:
> fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {
>
> As pointed out by Chao Yu, the code is actually correct as 'prealloc'
> is only set if the last_ofs_in_node has been set, the two always
> get updated together.
>
> This initializes last_ofs_in_node to dn.ofs_in_node for each
> new dnode at the start of the 'next_block' loop, which at that
> point is a correct initialization as well. I assume that compilers
> that correctly track the contents of the variables and do not
> warn about the condition also figure out that they can eliminate
> the extra assignment here.
>
> Fixes: 46008c6d4232 ("f2fs: support in batch multi blocks preallocation")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index a59ea8e60040..6f01aaddfce9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map,
> }
>
> prealloc = 0;
> - ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
> + last_ofs_in_node = ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
> end_offset = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_page, inode);
>
> next_block:
> --
> 2.9.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-02 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-02 13:52 [PATCH] f2fs: hide a maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-02 16:34 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161102163439.GA48728@jaegeuk \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fanofcode.li@samsung.com \
--cc=guoweichao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).