From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix conflict between atomic_write and truncate
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:18:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161212191851.GC61413@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161212131618.92800-1-houpengyang@huawei.com>
Hi Pengyang,
On 12/12, Hou Pengyang wrote:
> In fsync_node_pages path, after locking the last_page for setting dirty,
> we should check if the page has been truncated. Or there may be a mem leak,
> as this dirty last_page will NOT be found in next page-cache travese.
>
> This patch adds page->mapping checking, and will NOT rewrite the page if
> it has been truncated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index c1bbfdc..78c5b50 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1410,6 +1410,11 @@ int fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
> "Retry to write fsync mark: ino=%u, idx=%lx",
> ino, last_page->index);
> lock_page(last_page);
We grabbed a reference count for this last_page, and thus, it won't be released.
Something that I missed?
Thanks,
> + if (unlikely(last_page->mapping != NODE_MAPPING(sbi))) {
> + unlock_page(last_page);
> + f2fs_put_page(last_page, 0);
> + goto out;
> + }
> f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(last_page, NODE, true);
> set_page_dirty(last_page);
> unlock_page(last_page);
> --
> 2.10.1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-12 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-12 13:16 [PATCH] f2fs: fix conflict between atomic_write and truncate Hou Pengyang
2016-12-12 19:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-12-13 1:11 ` Hou Pengyang
2016-12-13 1:21 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-13 1:34 ` Hou Pengyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161212191851.GC61413@jaegeuk.local \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=houpengyang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).