linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix conflict between atomic_write and truncate
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:21:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213012109.GA8811@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <584F4AD8.4000008@huawei.com>

Hi,

On 12/13, Hou Pengyang wrote:
> On 2016/12/13 3:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Pengyang,
> >
> Hi, kim,
> > On 12/12, Hou Pengyang wrote:
> >> In fsync_node_pages path, after locking the last_page for setting dirty,
> >> we should check if the page has been truncated. Or there may be a mem leak,
> >> as this dirty last_page will NOT be found in next page-cache travese.
> >>
> >> This patch adds page->mapping checking, and will NOT rewrite the page if
> >> it has been truncated.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >>   fs/f2fs/node.c | 5 +++++
> >>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> index c1bbfdc..78c5b50 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> @@ -1410,6 +1410,11 @@ int fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
> >>   			"Retry to write fsync mark: ino=%u, idx=%lx",
> >>   					ino, last_page->index);
> >>   		lock_page(last_page);
> >
> > We grabbed a reference count for this last_page, and thus, it won't be released.
> > Something that I missed?
> >
> Some path (e.g. shrink) would NOT release the page if we've grabbed it,
> But truncate operation will invalidate the page from page-cache
> regardless of the page reference.

This is a node page, and we guarantee that nobody will truncate them.
Did you hit an issue regarding to this?

Thanks,

> Patch: 0fac558b965 f2fs: make atomic/volatile operation exclusive
> seems fix this issue by adding inode_lock(inode) to avoid conflict
> between atomic/volatile and truncate operation.
> 
> But this patch makes codes more robust.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > Thanks,
> >
> >> +		if (unlikely(last_page->mapping != NODE_MAPPING(sbi))) {
> >> +			unlock_page(last_page);
> >> +			f2fs_put_page(last_page, 0);
> >> +			goto out;
> >> +		}
> >>   		f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(last_page, NODE, true);
> >>   		set_page_dirty(last_page);
> >>   		unlock_page(last_page);
> >> --
> >> 2.10.1
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> >> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> >> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> >> Training and support from Colfax.
> >> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >
> > .
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-12 13:16 [PATCH] f2fs: fix conflict between atomic_write and truncate Hou Pengyang
2016-12-12 19:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-13  1:11   ` Hou Pengyang
2016-12-13  1:21     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-12-13  1:34       ` Hou Pengyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161213012109.GA8811@jaegeuk.local \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=houpengyang@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).