From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:42:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170106024238.GA6605@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97193665-85ae-268f-c50c-8b29bc4b57c7@huawei.com>
Hi Chao,
On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
> >>>> checkpoint.
> >>>> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually reusing
> >>>> them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
> >>>>
> >>>> # time fstrim /mnt/test
> >>>>
> >>>> Before : 6.158s
> >>>> After : 4.822s
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>>
> >>> One comment below,
> >>
> >> I still have a comment on this patch.
> >>
> >>>> -void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>> +/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
> >>>> +void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
> >>>> struct bio_entry *be, *tmp;
> >>>> @@ -646,7 +650,15 @@ void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>> struct bio *bio = be->bio;
> >>>> int err;
> >>>>
> >>>> - wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
> >>>> + if (!completion_done(&be->event)) {
> >>>> + if ((be->start_segno >= segno &&
> >>>> + be->end_segno <= segno) ||
> >>>
> >>> segno >= be->start_segno && segno < be->end_segno ?
>
> Still can not understand this judgment condition, we should wait completion of
> discard command only when segno is locate in range of [start_segno, end_segno]?
>
> But now, this condition can be true only when segno, start_segno, end_segno have
> equal value.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Urg. I rewrote it to use block addresses.
How about this?
>From fe24461eedd62815e0c56317f010a3a6e3004434 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 14:07:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: relax async discard commands more
This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
checkpoint.
Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually reusing
them.
Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
# time fstrim /mnt/test
Before : 6.158s
After : 4.822s
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 7 ++-----
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +++-
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index f73ee9534d83..1a9ba69a22ba 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -1254,7 +1254,6 @@ int write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, prefree_segments(sbi));
flush_sit_entries(sbi, cpc);
clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
- f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(sbi);
unblock_operations(sbi);
goto out;
}
@@ -1273,12 +1272,10 @@ int write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
/* unlock all the fs_lock[] in do_checkpoint() */
err = do_checkpoint(sbi, cpc);
- if (err) {
+ if (err)
release_discard_addrs(sbi);
- } else {
+ else
clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
- f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(sbi);
- }
unblock_operations(sbi);
stat_inc_cp_count(sbi->stat_info);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index bdcfe2a9b532..e0db895fd84c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ struct discard_entry {
struct bio_entry {
struct list_head list;
+ block_t lstart;
+ block_t len;
struct bio *bio;
struct completion event;
int error;
@@ -2111,7 +2113,7 @@ void destroy_flush_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *, bool);
void invalidate_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t);
bool is_checkpointed_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t);
void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t, block_t);
-void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
+void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *, block_t);
void clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct cp_control *);
void release_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *, bool);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 485b9118b418..672bcdefe836 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -625,20 +625,23 @@ static void locate_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
}
static struct bio_entry *__add_bio_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct bio *bio)
+ struct bio *bio, block_t lstart, block_t len)
{
struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
struct bio_entry *be = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(bio_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&be->list);
be->bio = bio;
+ be->lstart = lstart;
+ be->len = len;
init_completion(&be->event);
list_add_tail(&be->list, wait_list);
return be;
}
-void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
+/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
+void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
{
struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
struct bio_entry *be, *tmp;
@@ -647,7 +650,15 @@ void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
struct bio *bio = be->bio;
int err;
- wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
+ if (!completion_done(&be->event)) {
+ if ((be->lstart <= blkaddr &&
+ blkaddr < be->lstart + be->len) ||
+ blkaddr == NULL_ADDR)
+ wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
+ else
+ continue;
+ }
+
err = be->error;
if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
err = 0;
@@ -675,6 +686,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_async(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct block_device *bdev, block_t blkstart, block_t blklen)
{
struct bio *bio = NULL;
+ block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
int err;
trace_f2fs_issue_discard(sbi->sb, blkstart, blklen);
@@ -689,7 +701,8 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_async(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen),
GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
if (!err && bio) {
- struct bio_entry *be = __add_bio_entry(sbi, bio);
+ struct bio_entry *be = __add_bio_entry(sbi, bio,
+ lblkstart, blklen);
bio->bi_private = be;
bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_bio_wait_endio;
@@ -1575,6 +1588,8 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
*new_blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg);
+ f2fs_wait_discard_bio(sbi, *new_blkaddr);
+
/*
* __add_sum_entry should be resided under the curseg_mutex
* because, this function updates a summary entry in the
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index f3697f97e527..461c29043aec 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -770,6 +770,9 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
write_checkpoint(sbi, &cpc);
}
+ /* be sure to wait for any on-going discard commands */
+ f2fs_wait_discard_bio(sbi, NULL_ADDR);
+
/* write_checkpoint can update stat informaion */
f2fs_destroy_stats(sbi);
--
2.11.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-30 18:51 [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] f2fs: fix wrong tracepoints for op and op_flags Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 3:25 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] f2fs: add submit_bio tracepoint Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 3:32 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:35 ` [PATCH 03/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:07 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] f2fs: support IO alignment for DATA and NODE writes Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 8:23 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] f2fs: get io size bit from mount option Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] f2fs: show the max number of atomic operations Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 8:45 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:50 ` [PATCH 06/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 07/10] f2fs: don't allow encrypted operations without keys Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 8:56 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 9:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-05 3:19 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05 8:17 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05 19:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-05 19:46 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06 2:06 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-06 2:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-01-06 3:32 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 7:23 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23 2:08 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23 2:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: avoid needless checkpoint in f2fs_trim_fs Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22 7:23 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 10/10] f2fs: return fs_trim if there is no candidate Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22 7:23 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:26 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23 2:12 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23 2:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 3:24 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Chao Yu
2017-01-04 22:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:03 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170106024238.GA6605@jaegeuk.local \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).