From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs:use fggc_set_cold_data instead of set_cold_data in fggc
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:14:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170223021427.GA29369@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AE4322.60800@huawei.com>
On 02/23, Hou Pengyang wrote:
> On 2017/2/23 8:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Pengyang,
> >
> > On 02/22, Hou Pengyang wrote:
> > > When no dirty colde segment for fggc ssr, we do NOT set_cold_data.
> >
> > The get_ssr_segment() finds a victim segment across all the hot/warm/cold data
> > logs. When does this happen?
> >
> Oh, I miss the travel across hot/warm/cold, sorry.
> how about the following filter in get_victim_segment, which can avoid
> unnecessary afterwards bitmap scanning.
Yup, it makes sense.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index a0eed23..00791d2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -290,9 +290,16 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info
> *sbi,
> unsigned int secno, last_victim;
> unsigned int last_segment = MAIN_SEGS(sbi);
> unsigned int nsearched = 0;
> + int nr_dirty;
>
> mutex_lock(&dirty_i->seglist_lock);
>
> + if (alloc_mode == SSR) {
> + nr_dirty = dirty_i->nr_dirty[type];
> + if (!nr_dirty)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> p.alloc_mode = alloc_mode;
> select_policy(sbi, gc_type, type, &p);
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > index 4ee749f..a0eed23 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > @@ -666,6 +666,25 @@ static void move_encrypted_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
> > > f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * If NOT enough dirty cold data segments for fggc, fggc would consume
> > > + * a valuable free segment, which would slow down the fggc procedure,
> > > + * If there are NO COLD dirty segment, we do not set_cold_page.
> > > + */
> > > +static void fggc_set_cold_data(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_P_SB(page);
> > > + struct dirty_seglist_info *dirty_i = DIRTY_I(sbi);
> > > + int nr_cold_dirties;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&dirty_i->seglist_lock);
> > > + nr_cold_dirties = dirty_i->nr_dirty[DIRTY_COLD_DATA];
> > > + mutex_unlock(&dirty_i->seglist_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (nr_cold_dirties)
> > > + set_cold_data(page);
> > > +
> > > +}
> > > static void move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
> > > unsigned int segno, int off)
> > > {
> > > @@ -706,7 +725,7 @@ static void move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
> > > remove_dirty_inode(inode);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - set_cold_data(page);
> > > + fggc_set_cold_data(page);
> > >
> > > err = do_write_data_page(&fio);
> > > if (err == -ENOMEM && is_dirty) {
> > > --
> > > 2.10.1
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >
> > .
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-23 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 10:28 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs fg_gc: node segment is prior to data segment selected victim Hou Pengyang
2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs:use fggc_set_cold_data instead of set_cold_data in fggc Hou Pengyang
2017-02-23 0:39 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23 2:04 ` Hou Pengyang
2017-02-23 2:14 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-02-24 2:07 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-24 3:04 ` Hou Pengyang
2017-02-24 2:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] f2fs fg_gc: node segment is prior to data segment selected victim Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170223021427.GA29369@jaegeuk.local \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=houpengyang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).