linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] fscrypt: add some higher-level helper functions
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:48:14 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170921204814.GA7716@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170921174705.GA29643@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:47:05AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 04:45:02PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > fscrypto: clean up include file mess
> > 
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Filesystems have to include different header files based on whether
> > they are compiled with encryption support or not. That's nasty and
> > messy.
> > 
> > Instead, rationalise the headers so we have a single include
> > fscrypt.h and let it decide what internal implementation to include
> > based on the __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION define. Filesystems set
> > __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION before including linux/fscrypt.h if they are
> > built with encryption support.
> > 
> > Add guards to prevent fscrypt_supp.h and fscrypt_notsupp.h from
> > being directly included by filesystems.
> 
> This looks good; we probably should have done it that way originally.  This will
> allow us to have the inline functions like fscrypt_prepare_rename() defined in
> fscrypt.h, and then have supp/notsupp versions of __fscrypt_prepare_rename()
> instead --- so common checks like for IS_ENCRYPTED() will be in one place only.

*nod*

> One nit:
> 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION
> > +#define __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION 1
> > +#endif
> > +#include <linux/fscrypt.h>
> 
> How about doing
> 
> 	#define __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION)
> 
> (and likewise for f2fs and ubifs), then checking '#if __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION'
> rather than '#ifdef __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION'?

Yeah, that's cleaner. I'll modify it and resend as a standalone
patch.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-21 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-20 22:45 [PATCH 00/25] fscrypt: add some higher-level helper functions Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 01/25] fs, fscrypt: add an S_ENCRYPTED inode flag Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 02/25] fscrypt: switch from ->is_encrypted() to IS_ENCRYPTED() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 03/25] fscrypt: remove ->is_encrypted() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 04/25] fscrypt: remove unneeded empty fscrypt_operations structs Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 05/25] fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_require_key() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 06/25] fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_file_open() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 07/25] fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_link() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 08/25] fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_rename() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 09/25] fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 10/25] fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_setattr() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 11/25] ext4: switch to fscrypt_file_open() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 12/25] ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_link() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 13/25] ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_rename() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 14/25] ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 15/25] ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_setattr() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 16/25] f2fs: switch to fscrypt_file_open() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 17/25] f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_link() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 18/25] f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_rename() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:45 ` [PATCH 19/25] f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:46 ` [PATCH 20/25] f2fs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_setattr() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:46 ` [PATCH 21/25] ubifs: switch to fscrypt_file_open() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:46 ` [PATCH 22/25] ubifs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_link() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:46 ` [PATCH 23/25] ubifs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_rename() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:46 ` [PATCH 24/25] ubifs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_lookup() Eric Biggers
2017-09-20 22:46 ` [PATCH 25/25] ubifs: switch to fscrypt_prepare_setattr() Eric Biggers
2017-09-21  6:45 ` [PATCH 00/25] fscrypt: add some higher-level helper functions Dave Chinner
2017-09-21 17:47   ` Eric Biggers
2017-09-21 20:48     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-09-21 14:19 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170921204814.GA7716@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).