linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: heyunlei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
Cc: "Jianing (Euler)" <ning.jia@huawei.com>,
	"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] f2fs: Separate nat entry mem alloc from nat_tree_locks
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:14:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171111001415.GA924@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B685BFA705F94C860C6DD0752F0565482C0AE1@DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com>

On 11/10, heyunlei wrote:
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> >Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 2:05 AM
> >To: heyunlei
> >Cc: Yuchao (T); linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wangbintian; Jianing (Euler)
> >Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev][PATCH v5] f2fs: Separate nat entry mem alloc from nat_tree_locks
> >
> >On 11/07, Yunlei He wrote:
> >> This path separate nat_entry mem alloc from nat_tree_lock,
> >> which will benefit in some low mem case.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> index fef5c68..c6aea33 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >> @@ -257,22 +257,15 @@ static struct nat_entry *grab_nat_entry(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid,
> >>
> >>  	if (no_fail) {
> >>  		new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> >> -		f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nid, new);
> >>  	} else {
> >>  		new = kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> >>  		if (!new)
> >>  			return NULL;
> >> -		if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nid, new)) {
> >> -			kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_slab, new);
> >> -			return NULL;
> >> -		}
> >>  	}
> >>
> >>  	memset(new, 0, sizeof(struct nat_entry));
> >>  	nat_set_nid(new, nid);
> >>  	nat_reset_flag(new);
> >> -	list_add_tail(&new->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
> >> -	nm_i->nat_cnt++;
> >>  	return new;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> @@ -282,17 +275,32 @@ static void cache_nat_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
> >>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> >>  	struct nat_entry *e;
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> +	down_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> >>  	e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
> >> -	if (!e) {
> >> -		e = grab_nat_entry(nm_i, nid, false);
> >> -		if (e)
> >> -			node_info_from_raw_nat(&e->ni, ne);
> >> -	} else {
> >> +	if (unlikely(e)) {
> >>  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_ino(e) != le32_to_cpu(ne->ino) ||
> >> -				nat_get_blkaddr(e) !=
> >> -					le32_to_cpu(ne->block_addr) ||
> >> +			nat_get_blkaddr(e) != le32_to_cpu(ne->block_addr) ||
> >>  				nat_get_version(e) != ne->version);
> >> +		up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> >> +		return;
> >> +	}
> >> +	up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> >> +#endif
> >
> >Please avoid #ifdef as much as possible, which is totally undesirable.
> >BTW, it'd be better to give the mallocated e to grab_nat_entry() to consolidate
> >initialization stuffs?
> 
> Do you mean that delete the found nat entry and use the new alloced one?

Like this?

---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index d2530179cc9c..856b3aa9cab1 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -250,49 +250,67 @@ bool need_inode_block_update(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
 	return need_update;
 }
 
-static struct nat_entry *grab_nat_entry(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid,
-								bool no_fail)
+static struct nat_entry *__alloc_nat_entry(nid_t nid, bool no_fail)
 {
-	struct nat_entry *new;
+	struct nat_entry *new = NULL;
 
-	if (no_fail) {
-		new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
-		f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nid, new);
-	} else {
-		new = kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
-		if (!new)
-			return NULL;
-		if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nid, new)) {
-			kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_slab, new);
-			return NULL;
-		}
+	if (no_fail)
+		new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_slab,
+						GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
+	else
+		new = kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_slab,
+						GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
+	if (new) {
+		nat_set_nid(new, nid);
+		nat_reset_flag(new);
 	}
+	return new;
+}
+
+static void __free_nat_entry(struct nat_entry *e)
+{
+	kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_slab, e);
+}
 
-	memset(new, 0, sizeof(struct nat_entry));
-	nat_set_nid(new, nid);
-	nat_reset_flag(new);
-	list_add_tail(&new->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
+/* must be locked by nat_tree_lock */
+static struct nat_entry *__init_nat_entry(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
+	struct nat_entry *ne, struct f2fs_nat_entry *raw_ne, bool no_fail)
+{
+	if (no_fail)
+		f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nat_get_nid(ne), ne);
+	else if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_root, nat_get_nid(ne), ne))
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (raw_ne)
+		node_info_from_raw_nat(&ne->ni, raw_ne);
+	list_add_tail(&ne->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
 	nm_i->nat_cnt++;
-	return new;
+	return ne;
 }
 
+/* must be locked by nat_tree_lock */
 static void cache_nat_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
 						struct f2fs_nat_entry *ne)
 {
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
-	struct nat_entry *e;
+	struct nat_entry *new, *e;
+
+	new = __alloc_nat_entry(nid, false);
+	if (!new)
+		return;
 
+	down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
 	e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
-	if (!e) {
-		e = grab_nat_entry(nm_i, nid, false);
-		if (e)
-			node_info_from_raw_nat(&e->ni, ne);
-	} else {
+	if (!e)
+		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, ne, false);
+	else
 		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_ino(e) != le32_to_cpu(ne->ino) ||
 				nat_get_blkaddr(e) !=
 					le32_to_cpu(ne->block_addr) ||
 				nat_get_version(e) != ne->version);
-	}
+	up_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
+	if (e != new)
+		__free_nat_entry(new);
 }
 
 static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
@@ -300,11 +318,12 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
 {
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 	struct nat_entry *e;
+	struct nat_entry *new = __alloc_nat_entry(ni->nid, true);
 
 	down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
 	e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, ni->nid);
 	if (!e) {
-		e = grab_nat_entry(nm_i, ni->nid, true);
+		e = __init_nat_entry(nm_i, new, NULL, true);
 		copy_node_info(&e->ni, ni);
 		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, ni->blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
 	} else if (new_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR) {
@@ -316,6 +335,9 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct node_info *ni,
 		copy_node_info(&e->ni, ni);
 		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, ni->blk_addr != NULL_ADDR);
 	}
+	/* let's free early to reduce memory consumption */
+	if (e != new)
+		__free_nat_entry(new);
 
 	/* sanity check */
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_blkaddr(e) != ni->blk_addr);
@@ -424,9 +446,7 @@ void get_node_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, struct node_info *ni)
 	f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
 cache:
 	/* cache nat entry */
-	down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
 	cache_nat_entry(sbi, nid, &ne);
-	up_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2371,8 +2391,8 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 
 		ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
 		if (!ne) {
-			ne = grab_nat_entry(nm_i, nid, true);
-			node_info_from_raw_nat(&ne->ni, &raw_ne);
+			ne = __alloc_nat_entry(nid, true);
+			__init_nat_entry(nm_i, ne, &raw_ne, true);
 		}
 
 		/*
-- 
2.14.0.rc1.383.gd1ce394fe2-goog


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-11  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-07  9:47 [PATCH v5] f2fs: Separate nat entry mem alloc from nat_tree_locks Yunlei He
2017-11-08  8:46 ` Chao Yu
2017-11-09 18:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-11-10  3:26   ` heyunlei
2017-11-11  0:14     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-11-11  1:16       ` Chao Yu
2017-11-12  2:40         ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171111001415.GA924@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=heyunlei@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ning.jia@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).