From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ross Zwisler Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/63] Convert page cache to XArray Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 15:37:42 -0600 Message-ID: <20180531213742.GE28256@linux.intel.com> References: <20180414141316.7167-1-willy@infradead.org> <20180416160133.GA12434@linux.intel.com> <20180531213643.GD28256@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1fOVGd-0001Qv-UR for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:37:55 +0000 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1fOVGZ-00HE0i-Hk for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:37:55 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180531213643.GD28256@linux.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Ross Zwisler , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Jan Kara , Jeff Layton , Lukas Czerner , Christoph Hellwig , Goldwyn Rodrigues , Nicholas Piggin , Ryusuke Konishi , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , James Simmons , Mike Kravetz On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 03:36:43PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:01:33AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 07:12:13AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > From: Matthew Wilcox > > > > > > This conversion keeps the radix tree and XArray data structures in sync > > > at all times. That allows us to convert the page cache one function at > > > a time and should allow for easier bisection. Other than renaming some > > > elements of the structures, the data structures are fundamentally > > > unchanged; a radix tree walk and an XArray walk will touch the same > > > number of cachelines. I have changes planned to the XArray data > > > structure, but those will happen in future patches. > > > > I've hit a few failures when throwing this into my test setup. The first two > > seem like similar bugs hit in two different ways, the third seems unique. > > I've verified that these don't seem to happen with the next-20180413 baseline. > > Hey Matthew, did you ever figure out these failures? Never mind, just saw your mail from a few weeks ago. :-/ I'll retest on my end. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot