Re: [PATCH] f2fs: don't clear CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG

[Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>]

On 02/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/2/12 10:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > If we met this once, let fsck.f2fs clear this only.
> > Note that, this addresses all the subtle fault injection test.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 03fea4efd64b..10a3ada28715 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -1267,8 +1267,6 @@ static void update_ckpt_flags(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >  
> >  	if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_SKIP_FLUSH))
> >  		__set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
> > -	else
> > -		__clear_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
> 
> I didn't get it, previously, if we didn't persist all quota file's data in
> checkpoint, then we will tag CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG in CP area, but in current
> checkpoint, we have persisted all quota file's data, quota files are consistent
> with all other files in filesystem, why we can't remove this NEED_FSCK flag..?

I said it's subtle. So, I guessed 1) set CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG, 2) clear
SBI_QUOTA_SKIP_FLUSH by checkpoint, 3) clear CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG by another
checkpoint?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >  
> >  	if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR))
> >  		__set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG);
> >