linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/10] fsverity: Add call back to verify file holes
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:34:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218100433.20048-9-chandan@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218100433.20048-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com>

readpage() implmentations zero out part of the page-cache page mapping a
file hole. This commit adds a call back to "struct fsverity_operations"
which readpage() can invoke to verify the file hole.

Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c          | 1 +
 include/linux/fsverity.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 4493ddc357c6..94e0d4b56653 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1459,6 +1459,7 @@ static const struct fsverity_operations ext4_verityops = {
 	.read_metadata_page	= ext4_read_verity_metadata_page,
 	.verity_required	= ext4_verity_required,
 	.readpage_limit		= ext4_readpage_limit,
+	.check_hole		= fsverity_check_hole,
 };
 #endif /* CONFIG_FS_VERITY */
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fsverity.h b/include/linux/fsverity.h
index fc8113acbbfe..8bc28b07d550 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsverity.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsverity.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct fsverity_operations {
 	struct page *(*read_metadata_page)(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index);
 	bool (*verity_required)(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index);
 	loff_t (*readpage_limit)(struct inode *inode);
+	bool (*check_hole)(struct inode *inode, struct page *page);
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_VERITY
-- 
2.19.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-18 10:04 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Consolidate Post read processing code Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] ext4: use IS_ENCRYPTED() to check encryption status Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] f2fs: " Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] fscrypt: remove filesystem specific build config option Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-19 23:22   ` Eric Biggers
2019-02-21 12:51     ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] fsverity: Add call back to decide if verity check has to be performed Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-19 23:26   ` Eric Biggers
2019-02-21 12:54     ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] Introduce REQ_POST_READ_PROC bio flag Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-20  0:21   ` Eric Biggers
2019-02-21 13:03     ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] fsverity: Add call back to determine readpage limit Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2019-02-20  0:35   ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] fsverity: Add call back to verify file holes Eric Biggers
2019-02-21 13:05     ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] fs/mpage.c: Integrate post read processing Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] ext4: Wire up ext4_readpage[s] to use mpage_readpage[s] Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-18 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] Consolidate Post read processing code Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-19 21:17 ` Eric Biggers
2019-02-21 13:29   ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-20  0:41 ` Eric Biggers
2019-02-21 13:32   ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-02-21 18:38     ` Eric Biggers
2019-02-22  4:29       ` Chandan Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190218100433.20048-9-chandan@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=chandan@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).