From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Allow setting file birth time with utimensat() Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:04:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20190219040447.GX12668@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20190214220626.GV14116@dastard> <6a9dc05a-0445-d0ab-0140-1de4fee7ba9b@gmail.com> <20190217175450.psaesabv3vlzvjv4@angband.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Adam Borowski , Boaz Harrosh , Dave Chinner , Omar Sandoval , Linux FS Devel , Al Viro , kernel-team , Linux API , Linux btrfs Developers List , Ext4 Developers List , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:40:09PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > So I'm highly in favor of this patch. If XFS wants to disallow > writing the birth time, fine, but I think that behavior should be > overridable. Please, no. We need to have consistent behaviour between at least Linux local filesystems. Not "Chris thinks this is a good idea, while Dave and Ted think its a bad idea, so btrfs supports it and XFS and ext4 disallow it".