linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>,
	fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
	Jayashree Mohan <jaya@cs.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] generic: test i_mode recovery after power failure
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 07:22:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307202214.GH26298@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjDCcgX7B8vC8Dfd2Y20PkikdkFOz-Xttu5oG8nq3AYPw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:12:06AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:12 AM Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:44:54AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh, wait, we *already have that infrastructure*: src/fsync-tester.c
> > > > > > and generic/311.
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > Right now 311 is not "quick".
> > > That means adding quick tests to it without breaking it up or declaring it quick
> > > is not a good idea.
> >
> > Why would we need to change the group? Indeed, I almost never use
> > the "quick" group anymore because it doesn't mean "quickly run a
> > smoke test" anymore. It now just means "test doesn't take a long
> > time" but that still adds up to 30-60 minutes of runtime (depending
> > on storage) because of the hundreds of tests in the quick group.
> >
> > If you are testing crash recovery changes, then you are likely
> > running the "log" group to execute all the crash recovery tests,
> > maybe the "metadata" group, and maybe the "shutdown" group.
> >
> > So I don't think the this test not being in the "quick" group is
> > relevant at all.
> >
> 
> OK. Just pointing your attention to the fact that the test generic/520
> is a result of public discussion of how crash consistency tests should
> be aggregated into xfstests tests.

That was about how the crashmonkey tests would be integrated, not
generic fsync tests should be integrated.  There lots of
auto-generated crashmonkey tests them and they were proposing a
single fs test per single fsync test. We ended up settling  on
"aggregating into related groups" and generic/520 only covers one
specific group - only about 5 test cases of the many, many
crashmonkey test cases that were proposed. Which leaves me to
ponder: what happened to the rest of the Crashmonkey test cases that
were supposed to follow on from generic/520?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-05 11:47 [PATCH v2] generic: test i_mode recovery after power failure Chao Yu
2019-03-05 14:41 ` Filipe Manana
2019-03-05 20:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-06  2:29   ` Chao Yu
2019-03-06  5:00     ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-06  7:44       ` Amir Goldstein
2019-03-06 22:12         ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-07  7:12           ` Amir Goldstein
2019-03-07 20:22             ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-03-07 20:42               ` Jayashree Mohan
2019-03-09 10:15   ` Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190307202214.GH26298@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaya@cs.utexas.edu \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).