From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7650FC43613 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AD52075E; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="f+GyDzZJ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="DRqsOd5p" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 49AD52075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hdxfO-0000sI-BB; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:03:54 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hdxfM-0000s5-JM for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:03:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ToNfqA1qtuKBR7PgDNN9N50tBNymGFS9RPUY+mCXJFo=; b=f+GyDzZJcY72Zt8GAuweK/TQnY YuJn0LFjBDpzDvbOwh44tVi3r22MaPknk6nqj/Zva2hZpuoS05QLn8G5rKtwPqm80SsJT8/s8eIEx CqJiNrxhw+DbqDFgRw6iWX1HJ6rlNYFdPuvhV8fL6PGNqlr9f4Q4oizSVJKtVmTSylhc=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ToNfqA1qtuKBR7PgDNN9N50tBNymGFS9RPUY+mCXJFo=; b=DRqsOd5ps6ivrfp4OBMyGDyjsh 0VMEGcWBEcmW4pTQWAwlXtD3TrKCmOKGZ+WG/8DvrO1bPI7LkNx/d1wH5EQ9b+D0jEmyjesOvwxeW gLc+G6aFuyPrazXc4gVkeoaddzrm2qrpMcvE1zhlc1dv663sUKMbmRM7PRaM21mR+o90=; Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hdxfM-006XNO-Nk for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:03:54 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05638AF85; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A12B31E434F; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:03:45 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: "Darrick J. Wong" Message-ID: <20190620140345.GI30243@quack2.suse.cz> References: <156022836912.3227213.13598042497272336695.stgit@magnolia> <156022840560.3227213.4776913678782966728.stgit@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <156022840560.3227213.4776913678782966728.stgit@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Headers-End: 1hdxfM-006XNO-Nk Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/6] vfs: don't allow most setxattr to immutable files X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, clm@fb.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, matthew.garrett@nebula.com, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dsterba@suse.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, jk@ozlabs.org, jack@suse.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon 10-06-19 21:46:45, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong > > The chattr manpage has this to say about immutable files: > > "A file with the 'i' attribute cannot be modified: it cannot be deleted > or renamed, no link can be created to this file, most of the file's > metadata can not be modified, and the file can not be opened in write > mode." > > However, we don't actually check the immutable flag in the setattr code, > which means that we can update inode flags and project ids and extent > size hints on supposedly immutable files. Therefore, reject setflags > and fssetxattr calls on an immutable file if the file is immutable and > will remain that way. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > --- > fs/inode.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c > index a3757051fd55..adfb458bf533 100644 > --- a/fs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/inode.c > @@ -2184,6 +2184,17 @@ int vfs_ioc_setflags_check(struct inode *inode, int oldflags, int flags) > !capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE)) > return -EPERM; > > + /* > + * We aren't allowed to change any other flags if the immutable flag is > + * already set and is not being unset. > + */ > + if ((oldflags & FS_IMMUTABLE_FL) && > + (flags & FS_IMMUTABLE_FL)) { > + if ((oldflags & ~FS_IMMUTABLE_FL) != > + (flags & ~FS_IMMUTABLE_FL)) This check looks a bit strange when you've just check FS_IMMUTABLE_FL isn't changing... Why not just oldflags != flags? > + if ((old_fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE) && > + (fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE)) { > + if ((old_fa->fsx_xflags & ~FS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE) != > + (fa->fsx_xflags & ~FS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE)) Ditto here... > + return -EPERM; > + if (old_fa->fsx_projid != fa->fsx_projid) > + return -EPERM; > + if ((fa->fsx_xflags & (FS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE | > + FS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT)) && > + old_fa->fsx_extsize != fa->fsx_extsize) > + return -EPERM; > + if ((old_fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE) && > + old_fa->fsx_cowextsize != fa->fsx_cowextsize) > + return -EPERM; > + } > + > /* Extent size hints of zero turn off the flags. */ > if (fa->fsx_extsize == 0) > fa->fsx_xflags &= ~(FS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE | FS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT); Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel