From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289A5C48BD6 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22FE20815; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="HhOO0X6L"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="Tagq4f6+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="nB7qaexU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E22FE20815 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hgIBC-000879-Kp; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:22:22 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hgIBB-00086q-7S; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:22:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=OZ6e0FbvZ6ih1IklP3kOWEbcdJlaHfvXLF3leRVcWUY=; b=HhOO0X6LdUu2zIZfMLWyFP0mwy CjQVuXbLAkUMbRtNMRS7o/7/6iV38zFLZMFiQejjdKVQBRBBhw8blFpv/pCKrCFr92eN6isqvDnUw UHB2aGcBPS1kk/rRSY6sTgFTVtPTcB8hK+uCqB1CsMLhjCSQxIFV/qTUMhpgxgA7lIbA=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=OZ6e0FbvZ6ih1IklP3kOWEbcdJlaHfvXLF3leRVcWUY=; b=Tagq4f6+q+lBwyLZNNa6SRATYB R1IpSRzP0brrXrPmegTZfWDtL8Zz5v0XL0ht1B5bXV1NtfS0ynGBabtl1k7YYmXjKKw4lZRkyekm2 BwqWiYQkj6ePAD6GtZ6UkeiAxF9ez3saD56G1BRBvk7bHFhGptizYnA79OfpHisoj6eU=; Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hgIBD-00CE3x-Gu; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:22:26 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5R095sZ153911; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:21:35 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=OZ6e0FbvZ6ih1IklP3kOWEbcdJlaHfvXLF3leRVcWUY=; b=nB7qaexUVLsnWtZZL8ilmpxLc4CbV8CD4zkMKrWoh3xml3JhUaIp9+OiX8KWgEiq+QTV TmxH5cPDR/GN/Mim9pS0HSeUZriivu5IXjKymJeB4VlwuYqux8YFE96Q7ZuFaywS9GAs IfOynDYAH9wgXQWBBSy6D0VCSg6NmF9n/ECyAKjhrIbHx+AeA7tGFvV0wlMxz0hVhnnB xmxNQ5IUCjtH5vC5g7w5I84m4u6ESWlV3qRYMg8v1xYN3YBxl87OiOZnnvitl0kRmOQG ZRsajauz8/ilsNemW/ld4kcCe0+NXHIqitakDgA0iOejAf6kjQWlHHswxg9S0B9x2R/i YA== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t9brtd8qm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:21:34 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5R0I1KJ030470; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:19:34 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t99f4r2nb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:19:34 +0000 Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5R0JYLu032344; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:19:34 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2t99f4r2n4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:19:34 +0000 Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5R0JTqS006644; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:19:29 GMT Received: from localhost (/10.145.178.41) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:19:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:19:26 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: <20190627001926.GL5171@magnolia> References: <156151632209.2283456.3592379873620132456.stgit@magnolia> <156151633829.2283456.834142172527987802.stgit@magnolia> <20190626041133.GB32272@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190626153542.GE5171@magnolia> <20190626154302.GA31445@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190626154302.GA31445@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9300 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906270000 X-Headers-End: 1hgIBD-00CE3x-Gu Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/5] vfs: create a generic checking function for FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: shaggy@kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, matthew.garrett@nebula.com, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , dsterba@suse.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, jk@ozlabs.org, jack@suse.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 08:43:02AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 08:35:42AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > static inline void simple_fill_fsxattr(struct fsxattr *fa, unsigned xflags) > > > { > > > memset(fa, 0, sizeof(*fa)); > > > fa->fsx_xflags = xflags; > > > } > > > > > > and let the compiler optimize the crap out? > > > > The v2 series used to do that, but Christoph complained that having a > > helper for a two-line memset and initialization was silly[1] so now we > > have this version. > > > > I don't mind reinstating it as a static inline helper, but I'd like some > > input from any of the btrfs developers (or you, Al) about which form is > > preferred. > > I complained having that helper in btrfs. I think Al wants a generic > one, which at least makes a little more sense. Ok. > That being said I wonder if we should lift these attr ioctls to > file op methods and deal with all that crap in VFS code instead of > having all those duplicated ioctl parsers. That sounds like an excellent next patchset. :) --D _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel