From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, FSL_HELO_FAKE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEFECA9EAF for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41882067B; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="dkyI7LAz"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="mox/4fPY"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="an64t09X" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A41882067B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMeI2-0003V3-03; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:30 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMeHz-0003Uu-7l for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=w9mTEpUU8HqDNecb5o48iWRPNUYJj0A0dWSnU2dZhWc=; b=dkyI7LAzG/QYQ9E41XeSfUPbfr n+9QC9iRfrNgRE57rwLo2fRcu4V6q5T/Bm7W0DDL8l0y9cXSuH6OGvPsQEodKLwSkNdwqWVX2iw0S FKqYx3CfiVjs2xN8JAaBrzW82zAye54QQDw1MsIivkCy3fupVOjanMhe62zdSRdHsOPI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=w9mTEpUU8HqDNecb5o48iWRPNUYJj0A0dWSnU2dZhWc=; b=mox/4fPYix/sdEOybuw6g8Syd0 rSTgLvXcIZdB8ItftF0ir5g0nifdE4Hb6Ffzoh6d9V/woOUhrd0bJUxnB0HwUkajBz0DMuWJU8hWL vkpb1dKrgdM8xEV/Wu55NqUHNHZiqZuQdKnu85FCoKam0soOKeXF4D0KIEidCb2JyxfY=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1iMeHw-00AeMw-5m for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:26 +0000 Received: from gmail.com (unknown [104.132.1.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95FF12067B; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:28:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571689693; bh=yuyYH5txUJFQLMmsUgKioVsaetUA4KvG58kwl612GrY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=an64t09Xy6VRXqPUL3GAIscODkfzQVFm3dpCFD2yIaAOE6cETIfhBMD87q+snEVE5 Rom5MN9qzxQyKuQxxFpZ/OaBDo1FMMMEv9GyNL58gw4pnsTnZfAmj0n8bJyss80aop /MWy7freDt/FEOXG2dZ+xcYBu84nosqqtIrbVFc0= Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:28:12 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20191021202811.GB122863@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chandan Rajendra References: <20191009234038.224587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191009234038.224587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Headers-End: 1iMeHw-00AeMw-5m Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fscrypt: remove struct fscrypt_ctx X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Chandan Rajendra , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:40:38PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Now that ext4 and f2fs implement their own post-read workflow that > supports both fscrypt and fsverity, the fscrypt-only workflow based > around struct fscrypt_ctx is no longer used. So remove the unused code. > > This is based on a patch from Chandan Rajendra's "Consolidate FS read > I/O callbacks code" patchset, but rebased onto the latest kernel, folded > __fscrypt_decrypt_bio() into fscrypt_decrypt_bio(), cleaned up > fscrypt_initialize(), and updated the commit message. > > Originally-from: Chandan Rajendra > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Applied to fscrypt.git for 5.5. - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel