From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED42ACA9EB9 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BFE2084B; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="B4lNU8m9"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="W0/nJ/wM"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="p0Wf+fyQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B5BFE2084B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNRvC-0007De-Uz; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:28:14 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNRvB-0007DP-IC for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:28:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oOJSv5AEO1P0oZySMka50rrSmMrrts/dJHKNuIUqNOo=; b=B4lNU8m94OPvH26wDQ/UJKXn8k ZIxnk0vWaDTftftxGVhbPY2xdv2IqvDxW8Lin3LbpFxVV3JWuoyBy8tPhprdrUjxTt2A8WeTsrphJ xUO7FF67HrnYddheFg7x3BAdmikf4NNhEzlltkcQl0nGDIQcRzWswgLR2IGIT9F1LN88=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oOJSv5AEO1P0oZySMka50rrSmMrrts/dJHKNuIUqNOo=; b=W0/nJ/wMMk8MucGsDlfuhC/jMu pqQJD2Ss+TJ/YE+pB1h8yBpNHlmQOpL8X5/H8MVZEmi7yN9JsiDnis7TGIvsVoUlmPwKBmH0okNDH bzb5RGXFnVO6+tRau1OxqFBCM4aOtiXTIH2N4Sw9J1la7dPgTdsWayK25nF3M7LwR4L8=; Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1iNRv9-000wkQ-RR for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:28:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oOJSv5AEO1P0oZySMka50rrSmMrrts/dJHKNuIUqNOo=; b=p0Wf+fyQKYQ+zmCljn+rA0DQl 8YlfbIoi3u8Tc3vTG6MHb2BO+ialHTOQFunLNZ9gMdwbAMwG6gy6Q/TvM2k3NUvJF7ABzsT3zRfBt xcExWeK/TDjIQNu4gvsin8QqUt8gEEGaHXq4Q4dOWbGbrUCSqdKuotJTFmSOWmujaR0ZWYoUppVRK hBWeP5HCQRP3zpYSAYFf5HwokDoRdTCXs+lu3HbOGuM9WsaX16oG9zU9j9COwUyeEWDwEkDYjrymV kV4QiUrHqqJ4wSjVB3uX/suXqft0eZckiYWyJKyJOya03V/uoD6KUPpcN52hKGhI5zR5uMVawR9G+ D9uTgaupA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iNRux-00005c-2V; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:27:59 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:27:59 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Message-ID: <20191024012759.GA32358@infradead.org> References: <20191021230355.23136-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20191021230355.23136-2-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20191022052712.GA2083@dread.disaster.area> <20191022060004.GA333751@sol.localdomain> <20191022133001.GA23268@mit.edu> <20191023092718.GA23274@infradead.org> <20191023125701.GA2460@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191023125701.GA2460@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Headers-End: 1iNRv9-000wkQ-RR Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] fscrypt: add support for inline-encryption-optimized policies X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Satya Tangirala , Paul Lawrence , Dave Chinner , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Paul Crowley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > If and when the vaporware shows up in real hardware, and assuming that > fscrypt is useful for this hardware, we can name it > "super_duper_fancy_inline_crypto". :-) I think you are entirely missing the point. The point is that naming the option someting related to inline encryption is fundamentally wrong. It is related to a limitation of existing inline crypto engines, not related to the fudamental model. And all the other rambling below don't matter either. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel