From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C541C43603 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6A32465B; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="CLMmyGpR"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="ZEblqGEH"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q8pGDaDo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5D6A32465B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1if3te-0005EK-RW; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:27:26 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1if3td-0005E4-Ik for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:27:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HWkBtHwq5ekgYaKqQ/4BpvS+OaYoTATMHv1ThOXAzFw=; b=CLMmyGpRmDfLg13Dma90ZC0z3j sOeQFl0WoXF0vi0eW7/yoH2Kd0Xg/+b+dOmcLJOmWgPJLNwje1RPtSZ/Q0zjjkBXk8aoQ+Xv0frka S+kBou1JuSgpcOVR8ZCRRdL47rDLCQUXcIF5hWKUm0xeiCDO9s6vFBKCsULGrMHQIJ4M=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HWkBtHwq5ekgYaKqQ/4BpvS+OaYoTATMHv1ThOXAzFw=; b=ZEblqGEHPmRLk5bRNQx9NOiZw2 4M4XSzAb6tQgph0yvQcJmOwlEiVQjPtztFvQm7+xNraR/cCfBQL1CNWaNfckg9EwSBQQOddWCH6w1 N1mrqK8UlEubrmulEvg1n9r3D6uAo0nqQp64txDYWONlYeNoRuZN5zgHswHWbTyYy8tM=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1if3tX-001Dhp-Q8 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:27:21 +0000 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78DEB2173E; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:27:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576078034; bh=Xz/t/wynjo2NZjJEq2TcF4WrFDzLp8R080s7lDhb/L0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q8pGDaDoNJ/3LDQgU4yx/u+hF/BmUindDh0+KM9eo5BoxzAlx85oTqsBtsSnuEtCb efQk3zQxJ9LWmHk+gPm963srPKXX5lNdOBd+WKbSFtmID4N8h6KFXL18VMoTanehfy tLV/awA/yAVxQByXhKnXUl9Ji13f9PVsQc/TYJbU= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:25:52 -0500 Message-Id: <20191211152643.23056-28-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191211152643.23056-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20191211152643.23056-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore X-Headers-End: 1if3tX-001Dhp-Q8 Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 28/79] f2fs: fix to update dir's i_pino during cross_rename X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eric Biggers , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Sasha Levin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net From: Chao Yu [ Upstream commit 2a60637f06ac94869b2e630eaf837110d39bf291 ] As Eric reported: RENAME_EXCHANGE support was just added to fsstress in xfstests: commit 65dfd40a97b6bbbd2a22538977bab355c5bc0f06 Author: kaixuxia Date: Thu Oct 31 14:41:48 2019 +0800 fsstress: add EXCHANGE renameat2 support This is causing xfstest generic/579 to fail due to fsck.f2fs reporting errors. I'm not sure what the problem is, but it still happens even with all the fs-verity stuff in the test commented out, so that the test just runs fsstress. generic/579 23s ... [10:02:25] [ 7.745370] run fstests generic/579 at 2019-11-04 10:02:25 _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdc is inconsistent (see /results/f2fs/results-default/generic/579.full for details) [10:02:47] Ran: generic/579 Failures: generic/579 Failed 1 of 1 tests Xunit report: /results/f2fs/results-default/result.xml Here's the contents of 579.full: _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdc is inconsistent *** fsck.f2fs output *** [ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1378) --> Bad inode number[0x24] for '..', parent parent ino is [0xd10] The root cause is that we forgot to update directory's i_pino during cross_rename, fix it. Fixes: 32f9bc25cbda0 ("f2fs: support ->rename2()") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Tested-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c index 6b23dcbf52f45..0ace2c2e3de93 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c @@ -948,7 +948,8 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, if (!old_dir_entry || whiteout) file_lost_pino(old_inode); else - F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_pino = new_dir->i_ino; + /* adjust dir's i_pino to pass fsck check */ + f2fs_i_pino_write(old_inode, new_dir->i_ino); up_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem); old_inode->i_ctime = current_time(old_inode); @@ -1103,7 +1104,11 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, f2fs_set_link(old_dir, old_entry, old_page, new_inode); down_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem); - file_lost_pino(old_inode); + if (!old_dir_entry) + file_lost_pino(old_inode); + else + /* adjust dir's i_pino to pass fsck check */ + f2fs_i_pino_write(old_inode, new_dir->i_ino); up_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem); old_dir->i_ctime = current_time(old_dir); @@ -1118,7 +1123,11 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, f2fs_set_link(new_dir, new_entry, new_page, old_inode); down_write(&F2FS_I(new_inode)->i_sem); - file_lost_pino(new_inode); + if (!new_dir_entry) + file_lost_pino(new_inode); + else + /* adjust dir's i_pino to pass fsck check */ + f2fs_i_pino_write(new_inode, old_dir->i_ino); up_write(&F2FS_I(new_inode)->i_sem); new_dir->i_ctime = current_time(new_dir); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel