linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 05/79] f2fs: fix to update time in lazytime mode
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:25:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211152643.23056-5-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211152643.23056-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit fe1897eaa6646f5a64a4cee0e6473ed9887d324b ]

generic/018 reports an inconsistent status of atime, the
testcase is as below:
- open file with O_SYNC
- write file to construct fraged space
- calc md5 of file
- record {a,c,m}time
- defrag file --- do nothing
- umount & mount
- check {a,c,m}time

The root cause is, as f2fs enables lazytime by default, atime
update will dirty vfs inode, rather than dirtying f2fs inode (by set
with FI_DIRTY_INODE), so later f2fs_write_inode() called from VFS will
fail to update inode page due to our skip:

f2fs_write_inode()
	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))
		return 0;

So eventually, after evict(), we lose last atime for ever.

To fix this issue, we need to check whether {a,c,m,cr}time is
consistent in between inode cache and inode page, and only skip
f2fs_update_inode() if f2fs inode is not dirty and time is
consistent as well.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 fs/f2fs/inode.c |  6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 34e48bcf50874..72d154e71bb56 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -2578,6 +2578,20 @@ static inline void clear_file(struct inode *inode, int type)
 	f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
 }
 
+static inline bool f2fs_is_time_consistent(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time, &inode->i_atime))
+		return false;
+	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time + 1, &inode->i_ctime))
+		return false;
+	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time + 2, &inode->i_mtime))
+		return false;
+	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time + 3,
+						&F2FS_I(inode)->i_crtime))
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline bool f2fs_skip_inode_update(struct inode *inode, int dsync)
 {
 	bool ret;
@@ -2595,14 +2609,7 @@ static inline bool f2fs_skip_inode_update(struct inode *inode, int dsync)
 			i_size_read(inode) & ~PAGE_MASK)
 		return false;
 
-	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time, &inode->i_atime))
-		return false;
-	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time + 1, &inode->i_ctime))
-		return false;
-	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time + 2, &inode->i_mtime))
-		return false;
-	if (!timespec64_equal(F2FS_I(inode)->i_disk_time + 3,
-						&F2FS_I(inode)->i_crtime))
+	if (!f2fs_is_time_consistent(inode))
 		return false;
 
 	down_read(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_sem);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index 540d45759621a..a01be7d8db867 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -614,7 +614,11 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 			inode->i_ino == F2FS_META_INO(sbi))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))
+	/*
+	 * atime could be updated without dirtying f2fs inode in lazytime mode
+	 */
+	if (f2fs_is_time_consistent(inode) &&
+		!is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.20.1



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

       reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191211152643.23056-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-12-11 15:25 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-12-11 15:25 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 28/79] f2fs: fix to update dir's i_pino during cross_rename Sasha Levin
2019-12-11 15:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 67/79] f2fs: choose hardlimit when softlimit is larger than hardlimit in f2fs_statfs_project() Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191211152643.23056-5-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).