From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: avoid unneeded barrier in do_checkpoint()
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:00:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224220031.GC77839@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576f8389-ba27-b461-5466-cc62e84b5c92@huawei.com>
On 02/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/2/19 10:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 02/18, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> We don't need to wait all dirty page submitting IO twice,
> >> remove unneeded wait step.
> >
> > What happens if checkpoint and other meta writs are reordered?
>
> checkpoint can be done as following:
>
> 1. All meta except last cp-park of checkpoint area.
> 2. last cp-park of checkpoint area
>
> So we only need to keep barrier in between step 1 and 2, we don't need
> to care about the write order of meta in step 1, right?
Ah, let me integrate this patch into Sahitya's patch.
f2fs: fix the panic in do_checkpoint()
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> index 751815cb4c2b..9c88fb3d255a 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >> @@ -1384,8 +1384,6 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>
> >> /* Flush all the NAT/SIT pages */
> >> f2fs_sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO);
> >> - /* Wait for all dirty meta pages to be submitted for IO */
> >> - f2fs_wait_on_all_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * modify checkpoint
> >> --
> >> 2.18.0.rc1
> > .
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 10:21 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: avoid __GFP_NOFAIL in f2fs_bio_alloc Chao Yu
2020-02-18 10:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: fix to avoid triggering IO in write path Chao Yu
2020-02-18 10:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: avoid unneeded barrier in do_checkpoint() Chao Yu
2020-02-19 2:51 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-02-19 3:18 ` Chao Yu
2020-02-24 22:00 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2020-02-25 6:10 ` Chao Yu
2020-02-19 2:49 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: avoid __GFP_NOFAIL in f2fs_bio_alloc Jaegeuk Kim
2020-02-19 3:12 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224220031.GC77839@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).