From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AE2C28CBC for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 19:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF51206B9; Sat, 9 May 2020 19:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="B/18gqSQ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="mguN+26y"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LTjMTwNB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABF51206B9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXUlS-0008Mu-Vo; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:03:58 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXUlR-0008Mg-KY for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:03:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/0UwBeJLtFp8x8MzqU+5El1MI18/UzR9qLaInf5N9KU=; b=B/18gqSQdmmNti/d9vkXR006X4 ZiZqe81l/ULXFcKhQtb5tgxqaKMyhjirM479Ts8bBQFtdldSN7tnBihZfX5w0jrQbReHqkWiJTk+H MbB++YMttx8RMeIjj6dLcrA+p1Kt5JO0mwvW4H7Rozh1VLJdFKjey9BviZ0zARHuD/yo=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/0UwBeJLtFp8x8MzqU+5El1MI18/UzR9qLaInf5N9KU=; b=mguN+26yh9vltb3X8lqfRnL5CD 94LNuAC3R3OE5WfYnMfQETDL2b1OLIUDWujv4wXm641fQ5PsfNJR68cewqoyus6KjGhKeQE/vxOrF JaKW197otmmr1iaFyD94WeVhXGZn6fLT4hJFOIJiAdWRDFHV2x/1T9+Ed3JRS/PGRyU0=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jXUlP-005W4V-L9 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 09 May 2020 19:03:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC1CE206B9; Sat, 9 May 2020 19:03:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589051022; bh=lODxQLx7dBie1ZnMhupf2FdHGusr1dQe5rGiRUF3Jo0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LTjMTwNBOj/mfAdp1oULKrXa5F6uVH+VTd9N383SHsYike6cDsqCcW4YzqSI8KzII 3Wuc41WLdW8xahlJNdN9WAUML9Me44/zhOy9Jddo7QgPUlZ26b7mvhiZwqf3+l/wDu NGpd+SuvMsIZ7kXkPfwLyBehqvML72jly2TMeM+o= Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 12:03:42 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Message-ID: <20200509190342.GA11239@google.com> References: <1588244309-1468-1-git-send-email-sayalil@codeaurora.org> <20200508161052.GA49579@google.com> <0902037e-998d-812e-53e7-90ea7b9957eb@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0902037e-998d-812e-53e7-90ea7b9957eb@huawei.com> X-Headers-End: 1jXUlP-005W4V-L9 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V4] f2fs: Avoid double lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2020/5/9 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Hi Sayali, > > > > In order to address the perf regression, how about this? > > > >>From 48418af635884803ffb35972df7958a2e6649322 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Jaegeuk Kim > > Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 09:08:37 -0700 > > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid double lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint > > > > There could be a scenario where f2fs_sync_node_pages gets > > called during checkpoint, which in turn tries to flush > > inline data and calls iput(). This results in deadlock as > > iput() tries to hold cp_rwsem, which is already held at the > > beginning by checkpoint->block_operations(). > > > > Call stack : > > > > Thread A Thread B > > f2fs_write_checkpoint() > > - block_operations(sbi) > > - f2fs_lock_all(sbi); > > - down_write(&sbi->cp_rwsem); > > > > - open() > > - igrab() > > - write() write inline data > > - unlink() > > - f2fs_sync_node_pages() > > - if (is_inline_node(page)) > > - flush_inline_data() > > - ilookup() > > page = f2fs_pagecache_get_page() > > if (!page) > > goto iput_out; > > iput_out: > > -close() > > -iput() > > iput(inode); > > - f2fs_evict_inode() > > - f2fs_truncate_blocks() > > - f2fs_lock_op() > > - down_read(&sbi->cp_rwsem); > > > > Fixes: 2049d4fcb057 ("f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data") > > Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > > --- > > fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c > > index 1db8cabf727ef..626d7daca09de 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c > > @@ -1870,8 +1870,8 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > goto continue_unlock; > > } > > > > - /* flush inline_data */ > > - if (is_inline_node(page)) { > > + /* flush inline_data, if it's not sync path. */ > > + if (do_balance && is_inline_node(page)) { > > IIRC, this flow was designed to avoid running out of free space issue > during checkpoint: > > 2049d4fcb057 ("f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data") > > The sceanrio is: > 1. create fully node blocks > 2. flush node blocks > 3. write inline_data for all the node blocks again > 4. flush node blocks redundantly > > I guess this may cause failing one case of fstest. Yeah, actually I was hitting 204 failure, and thus, revised like this. Now, I don't see any regression in fstest. >From 8f1882acfb0a5fc43e5a2bbd576a8f3c681a7d2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sayali Lokhande Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:28:29 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: Avoid double lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint There could be a scenario where f2fs_sync_node_pages gets called during checkpoint, which in turn tries to flush inline data and calls iput(). This results in deadlock as iput() tries to hold cp_rwsem, which is already held at the beginning by checkpoint->block_operations(). Call stack : Thread A Thread B f2fs_write_checkpoint() - block_operations(sbi) - f2fs_lock_all(sbi); - down_write(&sbi->cp_rwsem); - open() - igrab() - write() write inline data - unlink() - f2fs_sync_node_pages() - if (is_inline_node(page)) - flush_inline_data() - ilookup() page = f2fs_pagecache_get_page() if (!page) goto iput_out; iput_out: -close() -iput() iput(inode); - f2fs_evict_inode() - f2fs_truncate_blocks() - f2fs_lock_op() - down_read(&sbi->cp_rwsem); Fixes: 2049d4fcb057 ("f2fs: avoid multiple node page writes due to inline_data") Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 ++++++++- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 ++-- fs/f2fs/node.c | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c index d49f7a01d8a26..928aea4ff663d 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c @@ -1168,6 +1168,12 @@ static int block_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) }; int err = 0, cnt = 0; + /* + * Let's flush node pages first to flush inline_data. + * We'll actually guarantee everything below under f2fs_lock_all. + */ + f2fs_sync_node_pages(sbi, &wbc, false, false, FS_CP_NODE_IO); + retry_flush_quotas: f2fs_lock_all(sbi); if (__need_flush_quota(sbi)) { @@ -1222,7 +1228,8 @@ static int block_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES)) { up_write(&sbi->node_write); atomic_inc(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]); - err = f2fs_sync_node_pages(sbi, &wbc, false, FS_CP_NODE_IO); + err = f2fs_sync_node_pages(sbi, &wbc, false, + true, FS_CP_NODE_IO); atomic_dec(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]); if (err) { up_write(&sbi->node_change); diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index d916540f12813..ac6ae42b9dd4e 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -3286,8 +3286,8 @@ int f2fs_fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc, bool atomic, unsigned int *seq_id); int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, - struct writeback_control *wbc, - bool do_balance, enum iostat_type io_type); + struct writeback_control *wbc, + bool do_balance, bool sync, enum iostat_type io_type); int f2fs_build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, bool mount); bool f2fs_alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid); void f2fs_alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid); diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index 1db8cabf727ef..fd00a8c119088 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -1808,8 +1808,8 @@ static bool flush_dirty_inode(struct page *page) } int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, - struct writeback_control *wbc, - bool do_balance, enum iostat_type io_type) + struct writeback_control *wbc, + bool do_balance, bool sync, enum iostat_type io_type) { pgoff_t index; struct pagevec pvec; @@ -1870,8 +1870,8 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, goto continue_unlock; } - /* flush inline_data */ - if (is_inline_node(page)) { + /* flush inline_data, if it's async context. */ + if (!sync && is_inline_node(page)) { clear_inline_node(page); unlock_page(page); flush_inline_data(sbi, ino_of_node(page)); @@ -1999,7 +1999,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_pages(struct address_space *mapping, diff = nr_pages_to_write(sbi, NODE, wbc); blk_start_plug(&plug); - f2fs_sync_node_pages(sbi, wbc, true, FS_NODE_IO); + f2fs_sync_node_pages(sbi, wbc, true, false, FS_NODE_IO); blk_finish_plug(&plug); wbc->nr_to_write = max((long)0, wbc->nr_to_write - diff); -- 2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel