From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54665C433E1 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 19:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23095207FB; Mon, 18 May 2020 19:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="D5tYexee"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="UagoQ7rq"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="yfi1rS2z" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 23095207FB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jal9d-0007Hu-Ul; Mon, 18 May 2020 19:10:26 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jal9c-0007Hm-Eu for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 18 May 2020 19:10:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ffLNHXSVyW47KC6nvN4aOBI3RsgSrd1C2FE8xdNIJzU=; b=D5tYexee3DfYrS0MVfotosgWml yYf3jBgnqqjgK76eZfjoHAjbJFn73ePvrIykGOWVXs86pCposXwqG/Ldxa+YnJq+CYALLonC11Ty2 E56waEr3/ZOSiHByOlD0RumJI9QRepvw6vz2u9dfBZnDhGl+3yd6ww13JmVwc3gI3WC8=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ffLNHXSVyW47KC6nvN4aOBI3RsgSrd1C2FE8xdNIJzU=; b=UagoQ7rqLe9mtLT+plQ3jl5jm3 MYoOcptNaRIMnevKNHOimdpffSY/TD66x9CstHEENx4+Wy0VdJQHzG7hEYD0IxzyMQHviA3wgGPYg U3z8BXiJXtJzYXyYm4GhKOwNnwcRzSI3yo7PZEsKHXCCmABes11T2TsEUtzFvq6Q6PNo=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jal9a-006D66-Ce for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 18 May 2020 19:10:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACBD9207F5; Mon, 18 May 2020 19:10:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589829016; bh=+BYYuf5XuFih3RHFGRRZsXlm1OumSHUnobuMeST/HIo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yfi1rS2zJwT7tnGoF+27OZWAMBr+kih9MD84K83keP8lAgFYuMZNeDhxneGEUwKMM vkXKn1BQ312CeuxYcZqo4RrRI+bRNIzLFWNHelvrbvMvf0ZbjHyYbcl+5EeU1OwGSU ZBzBVwL1j+b6/3b4L1Oc3LFVXbrmqEPrxYYY6Z6I= Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 12:10:16 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Eric Biggers Message-ID: <20200518191016.GA182581@google.com> References: <20200505204823.211214-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20200518180648.GB218254@google.com> <20200518183542.GA121709@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200518183542.GA121709@gmail.com> X-Headers-End: 1jal9a-006D66-Ce Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't return vmalloc() memory from f2fs_kmalloc() X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 05/18, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:06:48AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > From: Eric Biggers > > > > > > kmalloc() returns kmalloc'ed memory, and kvmalloc() returns either > > > kmalloc'ed or vmalloc'ed memory. But the f2fs wrappers, f2fs_kmalloc() > > > and f2fs_kvmalloc(), both return both kinds of memory. > > > > > > It's redundant to have two functions that do the same thing, and also > > > breaking the standard naming convention is causing bugs since people > > > assume it's safe to kfree() memory allocated by f2fs_kmalloc(). See > > > e.g. the various allocations in fs/f2fs/compress.c. > > > > > > Fix this by making f2fs_kmalloc() just use kmalloc(). And to avoid > > > re-introducing the allocation failures that the vmalloc fallback was > > > intended to fix, convert the largest allocations to use f2fs_kvmalloc(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > > > --- > > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 4 ++-- > > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 8 +------- > > > fs/f2fs/node.c | 8 ++++---- > > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > index 97b6378554b406..ac5b47f15f5e77 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > > @@ -895,8 +895,8 @@ int f2fs_get_valid_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > > int i; > > > int err; > > > > > > - sbi->ckpt = f2fs_kzalloc(sbi, array_size(blk_size, cp_blks), > > > - GFP_KERNEL); > > > + sbi->ckpt = f2fs_kvzalloc(sbi, array_size(blk_size, cp_blks), > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!sbi->ckpt) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > /* > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > > index d036a31a97e84e..bc4c5b9b1bf14c 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > > @@ -2953,18 +2953,12 @@ static inline bool f2fs_may_extent_tree(struct inode *inode) > > > static inline void *f2fs_kmalloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > size_t size, gfp_t flags) > > > { > > > - void *ret; > > > - > > > if (time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_KMALLOC)) { > > > f2fs_show_injection_info(sbi, FAULT_KMALLOC); > > > return NULL; > > > } > > > > > > - ret = kmalloc(size, flags); > > > - if (ret) > > > - return ret; > > > - > > > - return kvmalloc(size, flags); > > > + return kmalloc(size, flags); > > > > IIRC, sometimes, we suffered from ENOMEM from kmalloc, as some structures > > depended on the disk capacity. I can't remember exactly which structure tho. > > > > I think this patch already addresses that, by changing the large allocations to > use f2fs_kvmalloc(). Hmm, I worried a bit whether it covers every cases. > > - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel