From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310A0C433DF for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1E520659; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="mQFtamt4"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="L8z7JC0w"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="xlHwF5Iq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EE1E520659 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgWKN-0007F3-1A; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 16:33:19 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgWKM-0007Eu-5M for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 16:33:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=0WBjRUNV1SDyhZkuZ2ar6l2kjVP0Ok+YWTMMMwVfoEg=; b=mQFtamt44Yg2uJK3ai2VRWXbfQ zs12vD5iZSi1srkGqkU7FGEJT2BnAvmPIGWzqPPdU5l79wlCcFDuJS6qpxBeIrqAX57wjNXvod7ai n2/f5q/+Sn5nJy2rQ9HpsJgiKc1R76/MiMMehqIVwjpFLHJApagLyjiPAD+cQr0PGg6s=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=0WBjRUNV1SDyhZkuZ2ar6l2kjVP0Ok+YWTMMMwVfoEg=; b=L8z7JC0w1LHzXYltvf9zre3D5g pnvztggU6c6LHSvSBawncNwDcA7KXxEUdhVJvlHpj0Y5EewzfqpboR07lWORgW+ect3Vlv9D537YQ SLAEIvbR178id00z3LhWr0OOUSI4wBrCnvEGjzErpMuhJe3oRk4gVJ/yDi/LL7sq3r1s=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jgWKG-00Ad9O-84 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 16:33:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE52020659; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:33:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591201986; bh=UeyvD5lTRl9CaALyQXQ35OaTlk4Y8Iu9WFcFhDjPrzc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xlHwF5Iqqe6ND14zaTfdcDxIq+cqv3eS68xvWbxFvTk312yBJ7raLY0IZ2k5efFR3 hAlVMb78ccgZJBIuTCvF24ZwYieH8MbvHRspIohxtk57jCMkUtChDMexNa5wK80Oi6 iU76CJn6ieG0KMrr7g5gzoXbFpvg84jkkF7OdQHw= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:33:06 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Paul Menzel Message-ID: <20200603163306.GA85814@google.com> References: <92704294-45ae-7c3a-8cd5-e6f2352f2c53@molgen.mpg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92704294-45ae-7c3a-8cd5-e6f2352f2c53@molgen.mpg.de> X-Headers-End: 1jgWKG-00Ad9O-84 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] fsck.f2fs output on screen during start-up X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 06/03, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear F2FS folks, > > > With Debian Sid/unstable using a F2FS formatted Samsung SSD 850 PRO 512GB as > root partition, it looks like systemd always run a file system check and > fsck.f2fs always prints something to the screen (frame buffer), saying > something with *Fix corruption*. > > Info: Fix the reported corruption. > > Unfortunately, I am unable to find the message in the systemd journal or > Linux log (`dmesg`). > > Do you know, what fsck.f2fs is doing differently from the other file system > check variants? Well, that's the fsck message, given "-a" option, saying we'll scan the disk, only if we find a flag raised by in-kernel f2fs during the previous runtime. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel