linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE ioctl
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:51:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200609165107.GA228564@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200609060137.143501-1-daeho43@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:01:37PM +0900, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> 
> Added a new ioctl to send discard commands or/and zero out
> to whole data area of a regular file for security reason.

With this ioctl available, what is the exact procedure to write and then later
securely erase a file on f2fs?  In particular, how can the user prevent f2fs
from making multiple copies of file data blocks as part of garbage collection?

> +static int f2fs_secure_erase(struct block_device *bdev, block_t block,
> +					block_t len, u32 flags)
> +{
> +	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> +	sector_t sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(block);
> +	sector_t nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!q)
> +		return -ENXIO;

Why can the request_queue be NULL here?

> +
> +	if (flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_DISCARD)
> +		ret = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, sector, nr_sects, GFP_NOFS,
> +						blk_queue_secure_erase(q) ?
> +						BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE : 0);
> +
> +	if (!ret && flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT)
> +		ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, sector, nr_sects, GFP_NOFS, 0);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int f2fs_sec_trim_file(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> +	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> +	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> +	struct block_device *prev_bdev = NULL;
> +	loff_t file_size;
> +	pgoff_t index, pg_start = 0, pg_end;
> +	block_t prev_block = 0, len = 0;
> +	u32 flags;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) ||
> +			f2fs_compressed_file(inode))
> +		return -EINVAL;

Is it valid to check f2fs_is_atomic_file() and f2fs_compressed_file() outside of
inode_lock()?

> +
> +	if (f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb))
> +		return -EROFS;

Isn't this redundant with mnt_want_write_file()?

Also, shouldn't write access to the file be required, i.e.
(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)?  Then the f2fs_readonly() and
mnt_want_write_file() checks would be unnecessary.

> +
> +	if (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Doesn't this check have to be serialized with remount?

> +
> +	if (get_user(flags, (u32 __user *)arg))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	if (!(flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_MASK))
> +		return -EINVAL;

Need to reject unknown flags:

	if (flags & ~F2FS_TRIM_FILE_MASK)
		return -EINVAL;

> +
> +	if (flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_DISCARD && !f2fs_hw_support_discard(sbi))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	inode_lock(inode);
> +
> +	file_size = i_size_read(inode);
> +	if (!file_size)
> +		goto err;

->i_size is stable while holding inode_lock().  So just use ->i_size instead of
i_size_read().

> +	pg_end = (pgoff_t)round_up(file_size, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

This can be simplified to:

	pg_end = DIV_ROUND_UP(file_size, PAGE_SIZE);


- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-09 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-09  6:01 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE ioctl Daeho Jeong
2020-06-09 16:51 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-06-10  2:05   ` Daeho Jeong
2020-06-10  3:15     ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-10  3:55       ` Daeho Jeong
2020-06-10 23:31         ` Daeho Jeong
2020-06-10 23:53           ` Daeho Jeong
2020-06-11  0:00             ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-11  0:23               ` Daeho Jeong
2020-06-11  1:56                 ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-11  2:05                   ` Daeho Jeong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-11  3:08 Daeho Jeong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200609165107.GA228564@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).