From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F1DC433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0EE2073E; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="e3Sua6iT"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="k03F653H" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2B0EE2073E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnQ9I-0002h1-Nf; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:22:24 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnQ9G-0002gt-PE for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:22:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bJHBspBZ6QaoOryujB8ktlOOZD5dtQKEx9sM1l5qWj4=; b=e3Sua6iTzlKzKX5XNHuBqB3+fV M3VTyhX8ViW8mIxYkBgC1eGXi/hgwH2V9IxuTT6CTL9/UA5dBnvYaQZqdoCZP9yJf07d4I6INGsOj vjhDRQ7l3QgUygxvDfOOAKQL9eb0OiuWeIVVvSiLyBkReTcnV9WXGYCFwMkw2PlmqLvU=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bJHBspBZ6QaoOryujB8ktlOOZD5dtQKEx9sM1l5qWj4=; b=k03F653HH5a+IJrw6K85/duyKd T45ajEsnEdRhOx8qb0/EjAavKwaurdRt5BLfvSL4nlGOF2OV3W125OEwPHnYTusdPnOsWmnQw3BnU tBd86zArxHi1O4NIAd4WQFPFdglQ6QfWcFyEOI9QIcqfB3ysO3fyJtXMKKYHOAy0HxoQ=; Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jnQ9F-00C8W0-BF for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:22:22 +0000 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 202052C8; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:22:09 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Eric Biggers Message-ID: <20200622112209.71990f9c@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200622171106.GA192855@gmail.com> References: <20200622073907.7608a73a@lwn.net> <20200622171106.GA192855@gmail.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1jnQ9F-00C8W0-BF Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] docs: f2fs: fix a broken table X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Theodore Ts'o , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LKML , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jaegeuk Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:11:06 -0700 Eric Biggers wrote: > Someone already sent out a fix for this: > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-doc/52f851cb5c9fd2ecae97deec7e168e66b8c295c3.1591137229.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/ > > Is it intentional that you're sending out a different fix rather than applying > that one? It wasn't, actually, I'm just finding myself more than usually challenged these days. That said, removing the table entirely seems ... excessive. It's not terrible the way it is, or we could make it: test_dummy_encryption[=%s] if we really want to. jon _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel