From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DDAC433F8 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091AB2070B; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lists.sourceforge.net header.i=@lists.sourceforge.net header.b="J2KzybHW"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="jphmuPUY"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="JmaVa4MF"; dkim=neutral (0-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="fiwV9W1r" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 091AB2070B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lists.sourceforge.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:To:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rCU30qgE1CH9mKxg6kPIA3W1srKMf7vcI3+Hmms+KC0=; b=J2KzybHWZwx0hPNZ9yMR4HNEH qGLainyjZ9WZp7/t3omr86c+CGZPggpBZh+Of587Vnsu4psCzTeWrAEZ5VrTkElVx+ZK+44S365ZU kKt/CXHnucQHU1/d42Sa65N0JNteqny6njI53QuH/li5nm+P4WO4II2N8qxWESX7Ke3PQ=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jz2h2-0007j1-04; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:45:16 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <3MywbXwYKAPYqYrwYremmejc.amk@flex--satyat.bounces.google.com>) id 1jz2h1-0007ir-48 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:45:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e3QQnyJEAo5uWrYUDsDCPQeAxWHqtOZ6h6W8L9vv5Ok=; b=jphmuPUYL8q4DmferAIOX3fH5 nGIP/FJb1Wm0/FDTkQxw1qWRnNpniUfZLlm6KHzjkQnjPqgySBjjm8knkRiRsoay431I58q/vcbn3 Oe25R/5BNKnO1lP4PBLuHyMIQUEt4qFUUN6NR83eD8dXW7WuX7dQbrAiMElMc482OZoWM=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e3QQnyJEAo5uWrYUDsDCPQeAxWHqtOZ6h6W8L9vv5Ok=; b=JmaVa4MFaV8SjauuhALgKBallb kbkHCynlA1IR2JQxgcUrd1uglMVesaGzz4NDeTRRFrIklbFAx5VqvnDxmwa6QnDe/y+iOxkUAo/pC h3Djcn5A4Teos8VETOyRRL2SBGlhLcP5mH1ttZ0J+fGSVxD0vTqJTthDS4Tjx+l68KCM=; Received: from mail-yb1-f202.google.com ([209.85.219.202]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jz2gz-001epW-Lc for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:45:15 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f202.google.com with SMTP id a14so2913581ybm.13 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=e3QQnyJEAo5uWrYUDsDCPQeAxWHqtOZ6h6W8L9vv5Ok=; b=fiwV9W1rn8xIx3eZin4HllP1i3QSz+XUBPdewpcOoRimkQuoOrFrKuu38oLKdxH/DL vjPZdSY437ObQqT07i4flLI+1fCaVT7Ymuca2SmUy4H+CrkIrxGI6jsA4EgPZZauHHUt w/Tg2NAvoP98hkyUVK+5yBTBUA/3l8/6rYlDlWHfAmPIHHvKIXtSVukfxFwkMujd4Zv2 aD16Gnr0+DPz3kaVcz9meN+oEqmVMDwbCt7HOOFTt1XvP0x1pFx5ASr/LQ43SiIqmiEF dJNIHgPR6/zhiU7zn6P9EKElVptiQsjVOLZRH9RuAggnZ6iX8hjjZSEwMbuHQegF+4MK IBnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=e3QQnyJEAo5uWrYUDsDCPQeAxWHqtOZ6h6W8L9vv5Ok=; b=lttNAoYjYemHEEKiZ215GOzjvxGRL3ekAZNaFqFhkjRSUxdZ7zeWRocb4p3rBQK3tO 3rEAoIE7s/nowHbwYmP5sQPWUboqd23bpDUG/zn2F0iC4RBLnP9Bxjr1S8NmQ5m4eul/ MZjVXbUR8uiA0lYjor5VIAIpd5cmspmNbSrtymQ1ne4bUpAHLMI+48+zx0X2rpZtacca u7Lmqh8FjccMNmESOo3oNi0+f6Pguzt1rv6fsK/uA39CAAQBB+iwoBdVUrnwGsIO6NcP cnuBxJMNBTj6mPmLRUu9jnssD/Cc7NE3RZI9oHF9MeunpURPc2HEZNx41bCeXSSSJvs0 0TRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kkgk6G4f8M5RaQfAZ/u8F4xW6R5V3kX6ObveNEiWDAT35OrCj 9E6cBezC5AXHXfF8VNEJu7hMLLlXo7s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwl1gKyF3pfJ5ie868kPXKBua9doUzwDRqGLr8lKTqxr1HHAMw3xL4wn/F/CGySesYoXqUp4cD0u0I= X-Received: by 2002:a25:2417:: with SMTP id k23mr15167611ybk.300.1595616307826; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:44:55 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20200724184501.1651378-1-satyat@google.com> Message-Id: <20200724184501.1651378-2-satyat@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200724184501.1651378-1-satyat@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org X-Headers-End: 1jz2gz-001epW-Lc Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/7] fscrypt: Add functions for direct I/O support X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Satya Tangirala via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Satya Tangirala Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Satya Tangirala , Eric Biggers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net From: Eric Biggers Introduce fscrypt_dio_supported() to check whether a direct I/O request is unsupported due to encryption constraints. Also introduce fscrypt_limit_io_blocks() to limit how many blocks can be added to a bio being prepared for direct I/O. This is needed for filesystems that use the iomap direct I/O implementation to avoid DUN wraparound in the middle of a bio (which is possible with the IV_INO_LBLK_32 IV generation method). Elsewhere fscrypt_mergeable_bio() is used for this, but iomap operates on logical ranges directly, so filesystems using iomap won't have a chance to call fscrypt_mergeable_bio() on every block added to a bio. So we need this function which limits a logical range in one go. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala --- fs/crypto/crypto.c | 8 +++++ fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/fscrypt.h | 18 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/crypto/crypto.c b/fs/crypto/crypto.c index 9212325763b0..f72f22a718b2 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/crypto.c +++ b/fs/crypto/crypto.c @@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ void fscrypt_free_bounce_page(struct page *bounce_page) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_free_bounce_page); +/* + * Generate the IV for the given logical block number within the given file. + * For filenames encryption, lblk_num == 0. + * + * Keep this in sync with fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(). fscrypt_limit_io_blocks() + * needs to know about any IV generation methods where the low bits of IV don't + * simply contain the lblk_num (e.g., IV_INO_LBLK_32). + */ void fscrypt_generate_iv(union fscrypt_iv *iv, u64 lblk_num, const struct fscrypt_info *ci) { diff --git a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c index d7aecadf33c1..4cdf807b89b9 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c +++ b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "fscrypt_private.h" @@ -362,3 +363,76 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(struct bio *bio, return fscrypt_mergeable_bio(bio, inode, next_lblk); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh); + +/** + * fscrypt_dio_supported() - check whether a direct I/O request is unsupported + * due to encryption constraints + * @iocb: the file and position the I/O is targeting + * @iter: the I/O data segment(s) + * + * Return: true if direct I/O is supported + */ +bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter) +{ + const struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp); + const unsigned int blocksize = i_blocksize(inode); + + /* If the file is unencrypted, no veto from us. */ + if (!fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode)) + return true; + + /* We only support direct I/O with inline crypto, not fs-layer crypto */ + if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode)) + return false; + + /* + * Since the granularity of encryption is filesystem blocks, the I/O + * must be block aligned -- not just disk sector aligned. + */ + if (!IS_ALIGNED(iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_alignment(iter), blocksize)) + return false; + + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_dio_supported); + +/** + * fscrypt_limit_io_blocks() - limit I/O blocks to avoid discontiguous DUNs + * @inode: the file on which I/O is being done + * @lblk: the block at which the I/O is being started from + * @nr_blocks: the number of blocks we want to submit starting at @pos + * + * Determine the limit to the number of blocks that can be submitted in the bio + * targeting @pos without causing a data unit number (DUN) discontinuity. + * + * This is normally just @nr_blocks, as normally the DUNs just increment along + * with the logical blocks. (Or the file is not encrypted.) + * + * In rare cases, fscrypt can be using an IV generation method that allows the + * DUN to wrap around within logically continuous blocks, and that wraparound + * will occur. If this happens, a value less than @nr_blocks will be returned + * so that the wraparound doesn't occur in the middle of the bio. + * + * Return: the actual number of blocks that can be submitted + */ +u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 nr_blocks) +{ + const struct fscrypt_info *ci = inode->i_crypt_info; + u32 dun; + + if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode)) + return nr_blocks; + + if (nr_blocks <= 1) + return nr_blocks; + + if (!(fscrypt_policy_flags(&ci->ci_policy) & + FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32)) + return nr_blocks; + + /* With IV_INO_LBLK_32, the DUN can wrap around from U32_MAX to 0. */ + + dun = ci->ci_hashed_ino + lblk; + + return min_t(u64, nr_blocks, (u64)U32_MAX + 1 - dun); +} diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h index bb257411365f..5de122ec0464 100644 --- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h +++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h @@ -559,6 +559,10 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode, bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(struct bio *bio, const struct buffer_head *next_bh); +bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter); + +u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 nr_blocks); + #else /* CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_INLINE_CRYPT */ static inline bool __fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(const struct inode *inode) @@ -587,6 +591,20 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio_bh(struct bio *bio, { return true; } + +static inline bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct kiocb *iocb, + struct iov_iter *iter) +{ + const struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp); + + return !fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode); +} + +static inline u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, + u64 nr_blocks) +{ + return nr_blocks; +} #endif /* !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_INLINE_CRYPT */ /** -- 2.28.0.rc0.142.g3c755180ce-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel