From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44341C433E1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EFB42074D; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="Rr0owNmm"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="LxfpDEcK"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IsooUHbL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0EFB42074D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kALwu-0006gi-Th; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:32:24 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kALwt-0006gQ-A0 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:32:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tGTwP/THWKhMN3i8/vqy2882g5YjFKG1nE46qfkXtUA=; b=Rr0owNmmIY13XUJ9UNMR1iQEnt IX2nzdy0aH1FA6nFhZii2BXkrmbsbWYJRzWh483cxWXS5JHL6aSnDsmjQeyyKqhAUK0W5DdG60Jpk YzH34Ajp/BZt9ovMBCsj656Yf1n0q9FNBQn96WXmFnIi+UA9WeBkCvFnngo68ha86Yz4=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tGTwP/THWKhMN3i8/vqy2882g5YjFKG1nE46qfkXtUA=; b=LxfpDEcK3cJJzFUU42LIVXBY2Y S9nMUHa1tkSbIccNciRpv7xpMTpGtdfreWWaW/Kur7hbPUBCXqj4XU19vSE/mhrRN5+kuxXCWEgiR O4+UjkzpRPccdH/jnQwu+j39Xy5LHYYK6z6HM33BZ5MWBeZU5RbEgkfIw9pPOwzygOPM=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kALwr-00HTDe-BE for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:32:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1090C2074D; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:32:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598311931; bh=MHWFxrSNWgUFbkwhstp/6s6DxFuZbPykagmrmfORDj0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IsooUHbL1hbNjt/UxArRuXQ4gDx5qqLpZrSaveZCC0UMlS1Ca4PHW8BaGvurwQ/PM 0aFlZxQiWzqU2b6+2MLc9JWtCT2OCvP4nSwiSvkH8QOgdW7lsTBnv+LTZoxH5Ucz5x sabwm2+ayVwUI+Ntm4IX2sz/ljDaix2w++h75wVY= Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:32:10 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Eric Biggers Message-ID: <20200824233210.GA122905@google.com> References: <20200708091237.3922153-1-drosen@google.com> <20200720170951.GE1292162@gmail.com> <20200727164508.GE1138@sol.localdomain> <20200824230015.GA810@sol.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200824230015.GA810@sol.localdomain> X-Headers-End: 1kALwr-00HTDe-BE Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v12 0/4] Prepare for upcoming Casefolding/Encryption patches X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Daniel Rosenberg , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 08/24, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:45:08AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:09:51AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 02:12:33AM -0700, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > > > > This lays the ground work for enabling casefolding and encryption at the > > > > same time for ext4 and f2fs. A future set of patches will enable that > > > > functionality. > > > > > > > > These unify the highly similar dentry_operations that ext4 and f2fs both > > > > use for casefolding. In addition, they improve d_hash by not requiring a > > > > new string allocation. > > > > > > > > Daniel Rosenberg (4): > > > > unicode: Add utf8_casefold_hash > > > > fs: Add standard casefolding support > > > > f2fs: Use generic casefolding support > > > > ext4: Use generic casefolding support > > > > > > > > > > Ted, are you interested in taking this through the ext4 tree for 5.9? > > > > > > - Eric > > > > Ping? > > > > Unfortunately this patchset got ignored for 5.9. > > Ted, will you have any interest in taking this patchset for 5.10? Or should > Jaegeuk just take patches 1-3 via the f2fs tree? fyi; I think I can merge 1-3, if Al has no concern on 1 & 2. > > The fscrypt tree is also an option, but I feel it's not really appropriate since > this patchset is just a refactoring of the existing casefolding support. > > More reviews on patches 1-2 would be appreciated too. So far just Gabriel and I > have reviewed them. I was hoping that other people would review them too. > > - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel