From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D4DC2D0A8 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE392100A; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="ZEObyGec"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="HbXFnl3t"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JeRoDOX5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4AE392100A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kN17T-0003nJ-R3; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:55:39 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kN17T-0003n7-4V for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:55:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qyOyFtEYsGEXnuLN/bywwhuVWose1c+9P+/MCyNpYi0=; b=ZEObyGecB2bXhxz1yhNIdMDgwM X2BV754/7o2xOzDlJ5ioGVtUFiDq6/22s4qvo3kxofzZk8VclHgFRiEa8yAPbuu/45S7Nkm9UUsOS hZFvW1Ahu166DhIDDsQ46XKMb8Yi6qymKNw4fZOpQM5yAQdDgHRqJHlmaqXxWTwfaW8U=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qyOyFtEYsGEXnuLN/bywwhuVWose1c+9P+/MCyNpYi0=; b=HbXFnl3tc4aIqeaaZlGH3oLImd dVnvzUA7RFszh/N+cnJDRZtbdJEkumMIYHeAKWEfw0yCDG8d4hLoCesLoskX2aMARzGxCJDhdCOx7 M/oXjg1ZMp7tosojf3U1g5vkbhCtyR8+OBjGr5bX2GJi8aR1c74rwCFRRLLAylQFMCr4=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kN17O-009K4E-3Y for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:55:39 +0000 Received: from sol.localdomain (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77F1121775; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:55:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601330121; bh=htsG7cgCjOWP+vwgIjl2Fqt34Hd6Ri+elKAS7Sa4s9I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JeRoDOX5fGNEqD17+mt8alMS/Ia9anUvzJ/J58HMWp75rczK5TvFc7upYr25aFTI8 bTg4Nx/nPXozSDG5jlQS/tXr1awsFaY2y51DJRpQEEk2ieG+nhP8Ujyvy03NzcunRo 7kVX8u2ZU2gx42MvnDioqFMgJ0OtAzWZ2S6ug+FU= Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:55:20 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20200928215520.GC1340@sol.localdomain> References: <20200924042624.98439-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200924042624.98439-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Headers-End: 1kN17O-009K4E-3Y Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] fscrypt: avoid ambiguous terms for "no-key name" X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , Daniel Rosenberg , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:26:22PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > This series fixes overloading of the terms "ciphertext name" and > "encrypted name" to also sometimes mean "no-key name". > The overloading of these terms has caused some confusion. > > No change in behavior. > > Eric Biggers (2): > fscrypt: don't call no-key names "ciphertext names" > fscrypt: rename DCACHE_ENCRYPTED_NAME to DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME > > fs/crypto/fname.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > fs/crypto/hooks.c | 13 ++++++------- > fs/f2fs/dir.c | 2 +- > include/linux/dcache.h | 2 +- > include/linux/fscrypt.h | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) Applied to fscrypt.git#master for 5.10. - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel