From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911D3C43457 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2C92080A; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="Xd4hyyxM"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="PXkKttP4"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V7DSrccL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2F2C92080A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS0YZ-0000g7-7X; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:20:15 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kS0YX-0000fK-3Y; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:20:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YvFqWsLYgVbvxq6sRNepzCJbUDEZl7Ntt4MctB+hNXg=; b=Xd4hyyxMIrfMPYsyfNUnht/lpl Zzml+dh/mOZRHEJSbD5YKFynlHM2eT/ZlyCWPtyS2sDcuK1hTbqq5EQtQ58vsdrVjnW2Mc0KD5x1A OwQKzN2yh4XFF3J9As4U2NSKBtKqhSG2vq4AGLYxuPixxoHol8cRSj9uanWrGH3rljS8=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YvFqWsLYgVbvxq6sRNepzCJbUDEZl7Ntt4MctB+hNXg=; b=PXkKttP4GO9p4Iv2XwOCh1P3/1 8/cknqmwOtgoEjUI49g3nRz1PxjjeDZ4hBdr4SY4TLk8qRNZGCRtCUW5wKtrF8qvYL0phLjuCY+EZ nRPfZxYd8y6yiGkq17uM9kVpBsvyG4ygF/kVbejFi2z25kYGOfABdaQHOe+BvgNeyuFM=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kS0YO-00CKZr-EH; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:20:12 +0000 Received: from sol.localdomain (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22B302080A; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:19:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602519589; bh=FXrMfe87r7In01hy1fZxNUDLVXbtP/5TJ3+XTzWq1o4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V7DSrccLr5b4UIwMLihtwG0wHPpEpEeCdL4DEsryZDNbDbBe/031RRLLs/mkasjte GkozOXCGlriE75ewyNE/y/+1/YN0mvEXF3Fx+zkSk5bqABC19TCsH57zxXZt4yoDfc Gd/Q7Kn6Oc4wJMc886CZx9bFLur2svNEjPDcQyvk= Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:19:46 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Ira Weiny Message-ID: <20201012161946.GA858@sol.localdomain> References: <20201009195033.3208459-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201009195033.3208459-23-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201009213434.GA839@sol.localdomain> <20201010003954.GW20115@casper.infradead.org> <20201010013036.GD1122@sol.localdomain> <20201012065635.GB2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201012065635.GB2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Headers-End: 1kS0YO-00CKZr-EH Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 22/58] fs/f2fs: Utilize new kmap_thread() X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Fenghua Yu , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Jaegeuk Kim , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:56:35PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > And I still don't really understand. After this patchset, there is still code > > nearly identical to the above (doing a temporary mapping just for a memcpy) that > > would still be using kmap_atomic(). > > I don't understand. You mean there would be other call sites calling: > > kmap_atomic() > memcpy() > kunmap_atomic() Yes, there are tons of places that do this. Try 'git grep -A6 kmap_atomic' and look for memcpy(). Hence why I'm asking what will be the "recommended" way to do this... kunmap_thread() or kmap_atomic()? > And since I don't know the call site details if there are kmap_thread() calls > which are better off as kmap_atomic() calls I think it is worth converting > them. But I made the assumption that kmap users would already be calling > kmap_atomic() if they could (because it is more efficient). Not necessarily. In cases where either one is correct, people might not have put much thought into which of kmap() and kmap_atomic() they are using. - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel