From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED751C2D0E4 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619BD20729 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="ebm2kz/n"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="akc/fq/E" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 619BD20729 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf1aN-0005y2-EU; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:03:55 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf1aL-0005xb-I4 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:03:53 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LaPLV0ihMX5CikJIJIVgtyl/bpNK1fGKock4C6Enecg=; b=ebm2kz/nueFngRw0RmpFlOWG3A 3+xRwX7xsUN2q2PT67bsd8/Lv4nensqWghn0eNhzCcLgCy16j2QU/NKg/jaBFVtz0IDXndllf02be pVe9F+cir1l/DP0keTL6p7h8ROn4cR0bFuA+bq967IRXkuQjPJUSbR7G/c+aYy2VV8Ro=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LaPLV0ihMX5CikJIJIVgtyl/bpNK1fGKock4C6Enecg=; b=akc/fq/Elutyd5742kTz8bKIKk yHzHubPWtBRkkBIQXeJPEviF0DhdeGByfMYmVm/5lElm3ihkktoZOZltVnW8FamGqYJMtWHSpWiGr VpfDZ3pWchFtWHhsp1QNjNg4B76AFx88urkvAckc8Sey0p6zorx/jxuA7y98N7hgRgE0=; Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11] helo=outgoing.mit.edu) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kf1aE-00AOBx-GU for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:03:53 +0000 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0AHE3QfP007454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:03:26 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 18F8E420107; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:03:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:03:26 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Daniel Rosenberg Message-ID: <20201117140326.GA445084@mit.edu> References: <20201117040315.28548-1-drosen@google.com> <20201117040315.28548-3-drosen@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201117040315.28548-3-drosen@google.com> X-Headers-End: 1kf1aE-00AOBx-GU Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] fscrypt: Have filesystems handle their d_ops X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Richard Weinberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Alexander Viro , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 04:03:14AM +0000, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > This shifts the responsibility of setting up dentry operations from > fscrypt to the individual filesystems, allowing them to have their own > operations while still setting fscrypt's d_revalidate as appropriate. > > Most filesystems can just use generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops, unless > they have their own specific dentry operations as well. That operation > will set the minimal d_ops required under the circumstances. > > Since the fscrypt d_ops are set later on, we must set all d_ops there, > since we cannot adjust those later on. This should not result in any > change in behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel