From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A15C56202 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1AF92080A; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="Qp+hKw1H"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="AszNl+fE"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="wciZgUxR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1AF92080A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfIM4-0007sV-D0; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:58:16 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfIM3-0007sJ-5c for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:58:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KXm9ulroIbvXFqcTcTAaehIHTITRkOmvPfk4Em1ZVq4=; b=Qp+hKw1HFhveHzLuK+ydDetEc7 2XgO7O41/2I7PxmjgI1mz0vi9lU1KKzuaSmaypXN2VgYyqA08oQduLXhHNeu9FB7nTY9MabclfGnQ aXKFn3/xJdPwiSw2WGJxydJb0h1FooOM+xKudBW8l8ifR5FPxUOJGVbikZTIIF6mSF8Y=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KXm9ulroIbvXFqcTcTAaehIHTITRkOmvPfk4Em1ZVq4=; b=AszNl+fEXQ4k0MTL/in89nv/P7 oU9yoDivNIF1N/EqgxAG7Q6QkcNb/S9yXoX7luLU416q6sz0uK+0TdS9ebkYAFPyINoL6vMhZ07wl psVC3dL2P4X+qBgeLmYX+hRMWcf+JRDzpar//cbaqDVCO+zScNU3Iu9R9cDqkyzbqFfA=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kfILh-00Cf9h-VE for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:58:15 +0000 Received: from sol.attlocal.net (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01736246B3; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605686261; bh=D+Kyjii18F0waqpkVXSX3zdRISdLOoxWag/Zq/plDfg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wciZgUxRsT4BpUHM/xK7x+itYlwScHX5JDV4LPcCZe9NsPUlgYTrKiN3zfYXLus8i zSemoz4gBJxKD8n9MO4HB9NPQsGOvh+QR8JnCfwKXnzA/JeCOdF3AUjT4gsXrv0t/I UpASd0HyCEVENL+ByuFX13YPNCschjAJ91tiyRiw= From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:56:08 -0800 Message-Id: <20201118075609.120337-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201118075609.120337-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20201118075609.120337-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1kfILh-00Cf9h-VE Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/5] ubifs: prevent creating duplicate encrypted filenames X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net From: Eric Biggers As described in "fscrypt: add fscrypt_is_nokey_name()", it's possible to create a duplicate filename in an encrypted directory by creating a file concurrently with adding the directory's encryption key. Fix this bug on ubifs by rejecting no-key dentries in ubifs_create(), ubifs_mkdir(), ubifs_mknod(), and ubifs_symlink(). Note that ubifs doesn't actually report the duplicate filenames from readdir, but rather it seems to replace the original dentry with a new one (which is still wrong, just a different effect from ext4). On ubifs, this fixes xfstest generic/595 as well as the new xfstest I wrote specifically for this bug. Fixes: f4f61d2cc6d8 ("ubifs: Implement encrypted filenames") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/ubifs/dir.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c index 155521e51ac5..08fde777c324 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c @@ -270,6 +270,15 @@ static struct dentry *ubifs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, return d_splice_alias(inode, dentry); } +static int ubifs_prepare_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, + struct fscrypt_name *nm) +{ + if (fscrypt_is_nokey_name(dentry)) + return -ENOKEY; + + return fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, 0, nm); +} + static int ubifs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, bool excl) { @@ -293,7 +302,7 @@ static int ubifs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, if (err) return err; - err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, 0, &nm); + err = ubifs_prepare_create(dir, dentry, &nm); if (err) goto out_budg; @@ -953,7 +962,7 @@ static int ubifs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode) if (err) return err; - err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, 0, &nm); + err = ubifs_prepare_create(dir, dentry, &nm); if (err) goto out_budg; @@ -1038,7 +1047,7 @@ static int ubifs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, return err; } - err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, 0, &nm); + err = ubifs_prepare_create(dir, dentry, &nm); if (err) { kfree(dev); goto out_budg; @@ -1122,7 +1131,7 @@ static int ubifs_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, if (err) return err; - err = fscrypt_setup_filename(dir, &dentry->d_name, 0, &nm); + err = ubifs_prepare_create(dir, dentry, &nm); if (err) goto out_budg; -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel