From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FFCC2D0E4 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D102168B; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="j95B2GoK"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="B/POuxQJ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Q8Hr4pEJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1D102168B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khicO-0005bc-KI; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:25:08 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khicN-0005bU-75 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:25:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=E6Y2GUQrl7l3+VaGadnnLAYONHPT0cZa/DEl6sZYVU8=; b=j95B2GoKkGVGrt4MU3tV1DM5HA dB9NtnqN1OZkcTKnW+8xq7aPo4kp5BWTpRTi2wO8h5dwkcYEi3VTk2vTdySnSOXM2cu/ASPck3J0I vHTwSw4tFXr/ZEKMi22alq0z9kSFnYEIAfWAsuA9SaMW7bOwf32qP+QFxGDkxB2i6iOA=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=E6Y2GUQrl7l3+VaGadnnLAYONHPT0cZa/DEl6sZYVU8=; b=B/POuxQJZNE/OJSxcz+zzPc4gs 4SuRBAQz6amf1+vM5QOcVbIkufTFrqgQVNHhGqj0fHFb/Idlh32PKWbGWCVaqHEqRFKmJ5AWwx0HT ymIB5dFKQJgLUvRqaLRVnjUcgmUAdBOUCZxjUK8hLyvq2f/FAbtBjO6hV/xn+G75C734=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1khicJ-00E1RU-98 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:25:07 +0000 Received: from sol.attlocal.net (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB7B221741; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:24:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606263887; bh=vkE7h+iUKXjV3iZ6UKyjh74RIw0I8dTdzi+DtGmbbUg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q8Hr4pEJjWrF853VUCGWht1AfsKT2ByRq7EkZLk3ST0W88Ft8c5g+aDmZlRZkb3Ao pNIpg88N6acanGv9fJUVEenvHI2MW6dEQ5AXU91Uhz9UhD4neBNOsXTE/BilRpwcxk K7nOP0zDryiaAyBWv757MmUD+ZWi+BGM3UeNV0kE= From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:23:35 -0800 Message-Id: <20201125002336.274045-9-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201125002336.274045-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20201125002336.274045-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1khicJ-00E1RU-98 Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 8/9] fscrypt: unexport fscrypt_get_encryption_info() X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net From: Eric Biggers Now that fscrypt_get_encryption_info() is only called from files in fs/crypto/ (due to all key setup now being handled by higher-level helper functions instead of directly by filesystems), unexport it and move its declaration to fscrypt_private.h. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 2 ++ fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 1 - include/linux/fscrypt.h | 7 +------ 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h index 16dd55080127..c1c302656c34 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h +++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h @@ -571,6 +571,8 @@ int fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key(struct fscrypt_info *ci, void fscrypt_hash_inode_number(struct fscrypt_info *ci, const struct fscrypt_master_key *mk); +int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode); + /** * fscrypt_require_key() - require an inode's encryption key * @inode: the inode we need the key for diff --git a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c index 50675b42d5b7..6339b3069a40 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c +++ b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c @@ -589,7 +589,6 @@ int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode) res = 0; return res; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_get_encryption_info); /** * fscrypt_prepare_new_inode() - prepare to create a new inode in a directory diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h index a07610f27926..4b163f5e58e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h +++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct fscrypt_operations { static inline struct fscrypt_info *fscrypt_get_info(const struct inode *inode) { /* - * Pairs with the cmpxchg_release() in fscrypt_get_encryption_info(). + * Pairs with the cmpxchg_release() in fscrypt_setup_encryption_info(). * I.e., another task may publish ->i_crypt_info concurrently, executing * a RELEASE barrier. We need to use smp_load_acquire() here to safely * ACQUIRE the memory the other task published. @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ int fscrypt_ioctl_remove_key_all_users(struct file *filp, void __user *arg); int fscrypt_ioctl_get_key_status(struct file *filp, void __user *arg); /* keysetup.c */ -int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode); int fscrypt_prepare_new_inode(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode, bool *encrypt_ret); void fscrypt_put_encryption_info(struct inode *inode); @@ -408,10 +407,6 @@ static inline int fscrypt_ioctl_get_key_status(struct file *filp, } /* keysetup.c */ -static inline int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode) -{ - return -EOPNOTSUPP; -} static inline int fscrypt_prepare_new_inode(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode, -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel