From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCA2C64E7C for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 02:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0195322244; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 02:23:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0195322244 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkeH1-0007s5-HN; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 02:23:11 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkeGz-0007rm-3A for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 02:23:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U3b0B8HCS3uJ2lx7XRmyu7rMlITmjx3B1Li5gAaFvV8=; b=cwX0U/y9gk+gHYHd28jSP1a/gU 3lfO8no0EOIBocEqPNud/TLgMl6ahokzt0EDzIns1d+Z8jvq9XtDYsNt9FDCczKc8WDeyXEE9K95p L1J2QJjApxXVQQpdGW4g4JUtdgKpCSluS6YF+yzL8SFyj13er5RVAnmoyClaOv0/3iPQ=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U3b0B8HCS3uJ2lx7XRmyu7rMlITmjx3B1Li5gAaFvV8=; b=hZYMbidHd8GmSy+vK+LgDqBjoY HZ6hCTYUefz/h5CbBdREpIaeL2PNHFj3hTvbjU4ix+BDuK1CLJ3tjAPMxDnNB9hK0MzkFgJEFF20I VNdGhpy2Obzy8ZjdHOtDqY86EC0Y95wu9ujGwz43Yf1m74Rqnb7hOtdU4HF6oIEksPZo=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kkeGr-00CSon-9t for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 02:23:08 +0000 From: Eric Biggers Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format) To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:20:36 -0800 Message-Id: <20201203022041.230976-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201203022041.230976-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20201203022041.230976-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1kkeGr-00CSon-9t Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] ext4: don't call fscrypt_get_encryption_info() from dx_show_leaf() X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net From: Eric Biggers The call to fscrypt_get_encryption_info() in dx_show_leaf() is too low in the call tree; fscrypt_get_encryption_info() should have already been called when starting the directory operation. And indeed, it already is. Moreover, the encryption key is guaranteed to already be available because dx_show_leaf() is only called when adding a new directory entry. And even if the key wasn't available, dx_show_leaf() uses fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() which knows how to create a no-key name. So for the above reasons, and because it would be desirable to stop exporting fscrypt_get_encryption_info() directly to filesystems, remove the call to fscrypt_get_encryption_info() from dx_show_leaf(). Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index 793fc7db9d28f..7b31aea3e0253 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -643,13 +643,7 @@ static struct stats dx_show_leaf(struct inode *dir, name = de->name; len = de->name_len; - if (IS_ENCRYPTED(dir)) - res = fscrypt_get_encryption_info(dir); - if (res) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "Error setting up" - " fname crypto: %d\n", res); - } - if (!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(dir)) { + if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(dir)) { /* Directory is not encrypted */ ext4fs_dirhash(dir, de->name, de->name_len, &h); -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel