From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
ebiggers@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/7] fs: Expose name under lookup to d_revalidate hook
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 16:44:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220601204437.676872-2-krisman@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220601204437.676872-1-krisman@collabora.com>
Negative dentries support on case-insensitive ext4/f2fs will require
access to the name under lookup to ensure it matches the dentry. This
adds an optional new flavor of cached dentry revalidation hook to expose
this extra parameter.
I'm fine with extending d_revalidate instead of adding a new hook, if
it is considered cleaner and the approach is accepted. I wrote a new
hook to simplify reviewing.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
---
fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
fs/namei.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
include/linux/dcache.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 93f4f5ee07bf..a0fe9e3676fb 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@ void d_set_d_op(struct dentry *dentry, const struct dentry_operations *op)
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_OP_HASH;
if (op->d_compare)
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_OP_COMPARE;
- if (op->d_revalidate)
+ if (op->d_revalidate || op->d_revalidate_name)
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE;
if (op->d_weak_revalidate)
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_OP_WEAK_REVALIDATE;
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 509657fdf4f5..b2a2e715c1a8 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -848,11 +848,16 @@ static bool try_to_unlazy_next(struct nameidata *nd, struct dentry *dentry, unsi
return false;
}
-static inline int d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
+static inline int d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry,
+ const struct qstr *name,
+ unsigned int flags)
{
- if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE))
+
+ if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE)) {
+ if (dentry->d_op->d_revalidate_name)
+ return dentry->d_op->d_revalidate_name(dentry, name, flags);
return dentry->d_op->d_revalidate(dentry, flags);
- else
+ } else
return 1;
}
@@ -1569,7 +1574,7 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_dcache(const struct qstr *name,
{
struct dentry *dentry = d_lookup(dir, name);
if (dentry) {
- int error = d_revalidate(dentry, flags);
+ int error = d_revalidate(dentry, name, flags);
if (unlikely(error <= 0)) {
if (!error)
d_invalidate(dentry);
@@ -1653,19 +1658,19 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_fast(struct nameidata *nd,
return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);
*seqp = seq;
- status = d_revalidate(dentry, nd->flags);
+ status = d_revalidate(dentry, &nd->last, nd->flags);
if (likely(status > 0))
return dentry;
if (!try_to_unlazy_next(nd, dentry, seq))
return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);
if (status == -ECHILD)
/* we'd been told to redo it in non-rcu mode */
- status = d_revalidate(dentry, nd->flags);
+ status = d_revalidate(dentry, &nd->last, nd->flags);
} else {
dentry = __d_lookup(parent, &nd->last);
if (unlikely(!dentry))
return NULL;
- status = d_revalidate(dentry, nd->flags);
+ status = d_revalidate(dentry, &nd->last, nd->flags);
}
if (unlikely(status <= 0)) {
if (!status)
@@ -1693,7 +1698,7 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_slow(const struct qstr *name,
if (IS_ERR(dentry))
return dentry;
if (unlikely(!d_in_lookup(dentry))) {
- int error = d_revalidate(dentry, flags);
+ int error = d_revalidate(dentry, name, flags);
if (unlikely(error <= 0)) {
if (!error) {
d_invalidate(dentry);
@@ -3258,7 +3263,7 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_open(struct nameidata *nd, struct file *file,
if (d_in_lookup(dentry))
break;
- error = d_revalidate(dentry, nd->flags);
+ error = d_revalidate(dentry, &nd->last, nd->flags);
if (likely(error > 0))
break;
if (error)
diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
index f5bba51480b2..871f65c8ef7f 100644
--- a/include/linux/dcache.h
+++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ enum dentry_d_lock_class
struct dentry_operations {
int (*d_revalidate)(struct dentry *, unsigned int);
+ int (*d_revalidate_name)(struct dentry *, const struct qstr *, unsigned int);
int (*d_weak_revalidate)(struct dentry *, unsigned int);
int (*d_hash)(const struct dentry *, struct qstr *);
int (*d_compare)(const struct dentry *,
--
2.36.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-01 20:44 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/7] Support negative dentries on case-insensitive directories Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-06-01 20:44 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2022-06-01 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 2/7] fs: Add DCACHE_CASEFOLD_LOOKUP flag Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-06-01 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/7] libfs: Validate negative dentries in case-insensitive directories Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-06-01 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 4/7] libfs: Support revalidation of encrypted case-insensitive dentries Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-06-01 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 5/7] libfs: Merge encrypted_ci_dentry_ops and ci_dentry_ops Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-06-01 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 6/7] ext4: Enable negative dentries on case-insensitive lookup Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-06-01 20:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 7/7] f2fs: " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220601204437.676872-2-krisman@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).