From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+4793f6096d174c90b4f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 23:50:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221216155000.3204-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
There is a potential deadlock reported by syzbot as below:
F2FS-fs (loop2): invalid crc value
F2FS-fs (loop2): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
F2FS-fs (loop2): Mounted with checkpoint version = 48b305e4
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc8-syzkaller-33330-ga5541c0811a0 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/32123 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000c0e1a608 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x54/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5644
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0001317c6088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2205 [inline]
ffff0001317c6088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_ioc_get_encryption_pwsalt fs/f2fs/file.c:2334 [inline]
ffff0001317c6088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __f2fs_ioctl+0x1370/0x3318 fs/f2fs/file.c:4151
which lock already depends on the new lock.
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock --> &nm_i->nat_tree_lock --> &sbi->sb_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
lock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
Let's try to avoid above deadlock condition by moving __might_fault()
out of sbi->sb_lock coverage.
Fixes: 95fa90c9e5a7 ("f2fs: support recording errors into superblock")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/000000000000cd5fe305ef617fe2@google.com/T/#u
Reported-by: syzbot+4793f6096d174c90b4f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index cad4bdd6f097..4bc98dbe8292 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -2336,6 +2336,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_get_encryption_pwsalt(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
+ u8 encrypt_pw_salt[16];
int err;
if (!f2fs_sb_has_encrypt(sbi))
@@ -2360,12 +2361,14 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_get_encryption_pwsalt(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
goto out_err;
}
got_it:
- if (copy_to_user((__u8 __user *)arg, sbi->raw_super->encrypt_pw_salt,
- 16))
- err = -EFAULT;
+ memcpy(encrypt_pw_salt, sbi->raw_super->encrypt_pw_salt, 16);
out_err:
f2fs_up_write(&sbi->sb_lock);
mnt_drop_write_file(filp);
+
+ if (!err && copy_to_user((__u8 __user *)arg, encrypt_pw_salt, 16))
+ err = -EFAULT;
+
return err;
}
--
2.36.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-16 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-16 15:50 Chao Yu [this message]
2022-12-16 20:42 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock Eric Biggers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-14 11:47 Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2022-01-27 5:44 Chao Yu
2022-01-27 21:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-01-28 1:43 ` Chao Yu
2022-01-29 0:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-01-29 1:48 ` Chao Yu
2022-02-03 1:51 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-02-03 14:57 ` Chao Yu
2022-02-25 3:02 ` Chao Yu
2022-03-02 3:32 ` Chao Yu
2022-03-02 5:26 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-03-02 8:14 ` Chao Yu
2022-03-02 19:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-03-03 2:32 ` Chao Yu
2022-03-03 21:30 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221216155000.3204-1-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+4793f6096d174c90b4f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).