From: Hans Holmberg via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] f2fs: preserve direct write semantics when buffering is forced
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:56:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230605115638.GA23662@gsv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCDXnuV7oZwcYvRP@infradead.org>
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:39:10PM -0700, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:46:37PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > Yes, and that was exactly my point: with LFS mode, O_DIRECT write
> > > should never overwrite anything. So I do not see why direct writes
> > > should be handled as buffered writes with zoned devices. Am I missing
> > > something here ?
> >
> > That's an easiest way to serialize block allocation and submit_bio when users
> > are calling buffered writes and direct writes in parallel. :)
> > I just felt that if we can manage both of them in direct write path along with
> > buffered write path, we may be able to avoid memcpy.
>
> Yes. Note that right now f2fs doesn't really support proper O_DIRECT
> for buffered I/O either, as non-overwrites require a feature similar
> to unwritten extents, or a split of the allocation phase and the record
> metdata phase. If we'd go for the second choice for f2fs, which is the
> more elegant thing to do, you'll get the zoned direct I/O write support
> almost for free.
So, Jaegeuk, do you think suporting direct io proper is the way to do to fix this
issue? That looks like a better solution to me (at least long term).
Until that would be put into place, do you want my fix (with your code
style fixes) rebased and resent?
Cheers,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-20 12:20 [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] f2fs: preserve direct write semantics when buffering is forced Hans Holmberg via Linux-f2fs-devel
[not found] ` <CGME20230220123747epcas2p4c72ace14d10031df7aa116999ad5fe25@epcms2p8>
2023-02-22 11:08 ` Yonggil Song
2023-03-20 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-23 22:14 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-03-23 23:02 ` Damien Le Moal via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-03-23 23:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-03-24 0:06 ` Damien Le Moal via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-03-24 0:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-03-26 23:39 ` hch
2023-06-05 11:56 ` Hans Holmberg via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2023-06-05 19:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-03-23 22:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230605115638.GA23662@gsv \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).